![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
== Thanks
On /info/en/?search=Plaque_reduction_neutralization_test I left an edit with a question about further edits. Is there any way to attract the attention of other page editors so that they may answer the question and/or make edits related to the question?
Wikiscienceguru ( talk) 16:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I put comments for the COVID-19 pandemic in Ottawa's talk page. The article will include the map of Ottawa with confirmed cases, active cases, recoveries and death by neighbourhood or ward on the city map of Ottawa. Also, we are looking to add notable events based in Ottawa already been cancelled from last year. In addition, we need to add more information on the nearby city of Gatineau, Quebec on confirmed cases, active cases recoveries and deaths in the city of Gatineau, Quebec in this Ottawa related article. I already put my comments at the COVID-19 pandemic in Ottawa's talk page. Comments are welcome and I hope COVID-19 related article in Ottawa to make this an expanded article. Tell your fellow editors to make the COVID-19 pandemic in Ottawa an expanded article. Two ways you can reply either reply me on your own talk page, reply me at my talk page or reply your comments at the COVID-19 pandemic in Ottawa's talk page. I will be happy for your reply. I thank you and have a great day. Steam5 ( talk) 07:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, well I read your response at the Ottawa's talk page and it looks like the proposal to add Gatineau content is cancelled. Go to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ottawa's talk page on my response for the cancellation of Gatineau content. In addition, there is my second proposal to add notable events based in Ottawa was already cancelled from last year including the cancellation of the 2020 Ottawa Redblacks season for the entire CFL season is already cancelled, as part of notable events based in Ottawa to be cancelled from last year. Thanks. Steam5 ( talk) 06:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited We Are (Jon Batiste album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nate Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for notifying me about the dispute on the Louis CK article. I'll read through it and try to see if I can engage on the topic constructively. The conversation looks plenty heated at the moment. David in DC ( talk) 20:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIFO.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPE.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello I gave you a response the talk page hopefully you can give a response Black roses124 ( talk) 18:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, CaffeinAddict!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
17:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi CaffeinAddict. This is about your map at File:Canada provinces and territories with Vaccine Passports.png and how it is incorrect. Please change Alberta to yellow, as it has the Restrictions Exemption Program and not a broad-brush passport. Basically, the "In-scope operators" can force a passport in order to remove some restrictions, such as a 33% limit at movie theatres or a ban on indoor dining. If they do not force the passport, the restrictions remain. A by-law in Calgary forces the passport and program regardless, but other cities (including Edmonton) do not force it.
Please update your map to paint Alberta in yellow. It is wrong to paint it in blue, just like every other province, because Alberta's policy differs greatly from every other province. As you may know, I disagree with the "vaccine passport" system. Why? Pfizer paid over US$3 billion in medical negligence fines, Moderna is deemed a health risk for ages 18 to 24 in Ontario, and the AstraZeneca debacle (first deployed in mid-March, then constantly changing the advised age group, then almost entirely withdrawing AZ by mid-May for health risks) are all factors that do not instill confidence. I could go on, but please know that there are many valid reasons to oppose the forced use of passports. Nevertheless, I try to keep my edits as objective as possible. Thank you. -- LABcrabs ( talk) 05:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Alex Cooper made that comment on her podcast and it was captured Via tiktok. You can follow the link, it is her own words. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8rCRTPS/ MysticMinds ( talk) 03:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I notice you uploaded the poster image for The Closer File:Dave_Chappelle_The_Closer_Poster.jpg but it doesn't quite fit the Infobox in the article.
The image you uploaded seems to be 190 x 281 pixels. Looking at other articles the Infobox image seems to normally be 220 pixels wide.
Any chance you might upload a higher resolution version? (I looked at the IMDB page and looked at the html source and found the link to much bigger 1000px pixel version of the image.)
If you could take the 1000px version and scale it to 220 pixels it will probably look better, and fit the Infobox. (If you really want to mess around you might take the 1000x1401 image and crop 1 pixel off to make it 1000x1400 then and scale it down to 200x280 and see if that looks better. It wont fully fill the Infobox either but the image scaling might leave the image looking a little better.)
Anyway just a suggestion, it is entirely up to you. -- 109.77.204.25 ( talk) 05:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers ( talk) 17:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
hey CaffeinAddict I just want to let you know that all Ontario covid 19 cases will be added to the Ontario Timeline Page s201050066 9:27 pm eastern standard time — Preceding unsigned comment added by S201050066 ( talk • contribs)
My edit to The Closer (2021 film) was not "editorializing". The fact is that there is no evidence for the assertion. There's plenty of pages where unsubstantiated statements in the synopsis of a speech are pointed out. Condenser Coil 23:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi CaffeinAddict! I hope you're doing well and that your day has been pleasant. I just wanted to leave you a message in order to talk to you about some concerns that I have regarding some of your recent comments and responses toward other editors in some discussions.
For example, the comment you made here, here, and here. These comments are uncivil, and they directly conflict with one of Wikipedia's founding principle's. It's a real bummer to see a discussion turn into something like this, and I just don't want to see you get blocked or finding yourself in hot water with the community because of how you've recently behaved toward others here.
I just want to quietly and informally give you a nudge on the shoulder about Wikipedia's civility policy so that you can correct this behavior before it leads you into any trouble. If you need help with anything or have questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to me. I'll be more than happy to help you with anything that you need. I wish you well, and I hope that you'll take this as an opportunity to self-evaluate how you respond and communicate with others, and that you'll do what you need to do in order to keep calm, remain civil, and keep discussions positive and focused toward our primary goal of building an encyclopedia.
Thank you for taking the time to read this message, and I hope you have a great rest of your day. ––
FormalDude
talk
06:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
CaffeinAddict - hello - I was wondering if this page is on your watch list? ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalalabusyx46 ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi CaffeinAddict, I appreciate your interest in this topic and your feedback. However, I don't agree that addressing the widespread claims of misogyny against the podcast should be characterized as "conjecture." There are multiple other controversies surrounding the show which other editors have added to the page, and it seems that you have allowed those sections to stay put, with the exception of the section I wrote and another referencing the show's problematic messaging on sexuality. I would challenge you to reflect on your assumptions and why you feel that discussing recurring criticisms of misogyny is excessive or biased. Hopefully this will be a productive learning experience for us both. N0906 ( talk) 01:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just letting you know about the stricter rules for gender and sexuality related topics on Wikipedia. Don't worry, it's just a standard notice that has to be given and you've not done anything wrong. Sideswipe9th ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
NO! Stop lying to the general public. What is Mis-information? Who determines Misinformation? Can you define what apparent misinformation she has shared? You have also stated that the Wuhan lab origin is still misinformation? Its not! The Misinformation you state is alleged! The "official" narrative is not the only narrative. The science does not just come from the government, science is open to debate.
You also state Imverectin is misinformation. This has been proven and published by accredited scientists. Tess Lawrie is a prime example.
You are lying to the general public and pushing lies and misinformation!
Accredited journals such as the BMJ have also published numerous times regarding governments using the Covid Pancdemic to gain control over their people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FIXING-THE-PROPAGANDA ( talk • contribs) 15:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)