Welcome!
Hello, Bullet Dropper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
William M. Connolley (
talk)
20:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Classical liberalism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TFD ( talk) 18:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Since you have continued to edit war you have been reported and may respond here. TFD ( talk) 01:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Magog the Ogre (
talk)
02:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Bullet Dropper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I shouldn't be blocked unless the person that reported me is blocked, who also doing multiple edits, but worse by being vandalistic deleting information that was sourced. The person was FourDueces. Take a look: [1]
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason to why you were block which was edit warring while abusing a multiple account with FrenchTouchLiberal ( talk · contribs). Please also read WP:NOTTHEM. Elockid ( Talk) 03:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bullet Dropper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
FrenchTouchLiberal is not me! How can you use that against me without any evidence whatsoever???
Decline reason:
Evidence is obvious given the timing and content of edits by both of these accounts. Jayron 32 05:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have now reverted an edit three times within a short period of time and any further reverts will result in your being reported to the edit-warring noticeboard as before. TFD ( talk) 05:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jayron
32
05:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Bullet Dropper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Only did three reverts. And why does "Four Deuces" not get blocked for doing the same thing? [2] Is this place corrupt or what? Are secret messages being passed behind the scenes to gang up on someone who tries to make a change that someone doesn't like?
Decline reason:
Jayron actually just beat me to the punch in blocking you. 1) WP:EW is quite clear that only 3RR is not a license to edit war up to three times per day; you can be blocked for less; 2) you returned to reverting three minutes after posting on the talk page; you did not give discussion a chance as you were instructed was necessary 3) The Four Deuces wasn't just blocked for 3RR violation, and was reverting per WP:BRD, 4) you were editing against the consensus of several other editors, Four Deuces was only editing against you and 5) your use of personal attacks [3] (edit summary) while calling out other editors for doing the same [4] (edit summary) is entirely unacceptable. I doubt you will read this decline as the constructive criticism it could be; please don't prove me wrong and dig your own hole deeper. At the risk of sounding slightly uncivil myself, I will quote a famous essay of ours, if multiple people keep telling you you're doing something wrong, then they probably have a point. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Boo!
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. That discussion can be found here [5]. Thank you. Dayewalker ( talk) 00:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Classical liberalism. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adding formal notice as you have not received one yet -- Snowded TALK 04:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
You appear to be edit-warring on Classical liberalism and should note WP:3RR. You should discuss changes and work toward consensus. TFD ( talk) 20:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)