Hi Bossming! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at
the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (
talk).
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CptViraj were:
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Famigo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Famigo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself.
Corporate notability is based on what independent
reliable sources have written about the subject.
This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.
You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at
the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at
the Teahouse.)
If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be
nominated for deletion, or a
topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's
mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the
Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at
User:Bossming, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bossming|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (
talk)
07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Hello, Bossming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Bossming. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Famigo".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:FAMIGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hi @
Asparagusus. Can you help me understand what in particular looks like advertisement? This is not the intent at all as we absolutely value Wikipedia's unbiased source of information and as much as I tried to follow the philosophy, seems like I need guidance and will appreciate.
As far as references, several are by top tier unbiased and non sponsored news paper articles from EL Nuevo Dia and El Nuevo Herald and I am not sure if since they are in Spanish, I hope not but I am afraid the reviewer not understanding them they might be disregarded as not as important.
Hello,
Bossming. First, I wasn't talking about the references; per
WP:NONENG, non-English sources' merit aren't based on their languages (though I don't think I could properly gauge their reliability as I don't know much Spanish). The reason I declined your draft was because the prose seemed to have a bit of a promotional tone. Here's some examples:
"...to help independent artists, [and] influencers monetize their content."
This sentence feels somewhat promotional because of the word "help" as well as the list of their target demographics. This could be reworded to be something like "...as a monetization platform for musicians." This, however, may not work entirely, because of the confusing wording of the rest of the sentence. Something of the like, though, would.
"...under the guidance of CTO Tanmay Shahane..."
I would just cut this from the text. It is an unnecessary clause on its own, and it serves only to mention the CTO. It is (in my opinion) not important to the context of the sentence.
"The FAMIGO web-based marketplace allows the creator to sell single digital content, subscriptions, music, podcasts, shout outs[,] and anything digital."
This sentence seems promotional because of the word "allows"; this makes it feel as if the marketplace is very generous. It also feels promotional because of the list of its features (and especially the fact that it ends with "...and anything digital", which makes it sound exactly like an ad). One way to reword the sentence (if it's kept at all) would be, "FAMIGO also has a web-based marketplace for musicians." It also needs to be cited. (If you can't find a citation, then it's probably not worth mentioning in the article.)
"Since launch, Famigo has welcomed creators from multiple industries such as musicians Jowell, Randy, Ivy Queen, DJ Nelson, Cultura Profetica, Essene, Leen Beat, and other industries including master chefs Colombia Leo Cocinero, models, TV celebrities Darcey & Stacey Silva, and most recently sports & wellness, welcoming The Bone Collector and Colombia's soccer team, Atletico Nacional."
First, the two uses of "welcomes/welcoming": again like "allows". Too friendly-sounding; Wikipedia articles have to follow
WP:NPOV. The second complaint is my real problem with this paragraph: it's just a bunch of
WP:NAMEDROPPING. A list of notable people that use the service doesn't automatically make it
WP:NOTABLE.
Thank you for working to get this
WP:PAID article to follow guidelines. Hopefully this analysis helps. If I have time, I might go in and help with the prose of the draft, but I've already spent quite a bit of time writing this. Have a good day/night!
Hello, Bossming!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Asparagusus(interaction)21:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Asparagusus - I finished updating the company history. Thank you for your feedback. It looks more direct and specific to what I intended to write. I just needed guidance. Please let me know your thoughts and if the prose is reasonable. Best!
Bossming (
talk)
18:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
develop over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.