Hello Bo1958, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Bo1958. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 12:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa,
I can understand that Wikipedia pages should not be advertisings for companies or products. But we don't earn money from our webpage nor do we sell any product. The sole purpose of our organisation is to spread information about aeronatucial sciences and to get people together so that they can exchange information about their studies.
So I don't understand why me, as an ICAS coordinator, should not give the information about our organsisation in order to suplement that exchange. I think it's best to get first hand information rather than information form outsiders. As I wrote before every information that I put in are available for everybody on our website plus a lot more. Since I'm new to editing Wiki articles and I was tasked by our Executive Committee to have a look at the Wiki site and correct obvious mistakes right now I cannot see a way to do that. How do you handle big company sites like Boeing, General Motors and so on. I don't think that every information on those sites is coming from outsiders and since those sites are protected so that not everybody could put in/change information on those pages. And if somebody publishes information about a company without mentioning a product is even advertising, don't you agree? So please advice how to solve our little problem. As of now, I have to repeat myself, the information is not complete and in some parts incorrect. Like the article about presidents. Do you believe that our first president was elected in 1978, around 20 years after our foundation and in 2017 we had 2 presidents? Mr Shinji Suzuki is our current president and was elected from 2019 onwards. Bo1958 ( talk) 14:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in editing the article for International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences on Wikipedia. There are multiple problems with your submission. You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Wikipedia a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses. This is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at Wikipedia:Copyrights.
The second problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own organization or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.
If you'd like to use the copyrighted content in an article, you can follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission on how to obtain the proper licensing. If you are the copyright holder, refer to Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how to grant us permission to use your content. Alternatively, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available online. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. However you would then still have to abide by the conflict of interest guideline. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
I'm sorry this message could not be more favourable. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 22:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)