Of the three cases you note--Zelman v Simmons-Harris, Gideon v Wainwright, or Ogden v Saunders--Zelman is most in need of work. It mentions specifically that it could use work. I would go with that one. Boolean lint ( talk) 20:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Zelman v. Simmons-Harris page, your edit caused a URL error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)