I am entirely suprised you do not have talkboxes. SPOONGOAT AND POPTART 4 LYFE. -- Shinku Hisaki 01:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Thought I'd be the first to edit your talk page and say hello. After a few days of reading Wikipedia back in February, I finally registered too, for the same reason: to dang many little errors just begging to be edited. For example, my misuse of "to" in the previous sentence. -- Birdhombre 01:56, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Nice to see you've decided to sign up! I hope you'll enjoy it hear as much as I have. Here are some pages you might find interesting:
Uh, that welcome above was from me on 22:23, 5 February 2006, I just forgot to sign it. Thanks for your note! mennonot 09:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Tracked you down :¬) I haven't put much on here except for a very small & insignificant article for a small and mostly-insignificant charity i'm involved with, which i'm probably the only person who'll ever read anyway, but hello.
Ceri the Duck
20:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey, check out Santo Precario!!! You'll love him! Harrypotter 22:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Black Butterfly. Thanks for reverting Julian's personal comments on the SPEAK (animals) article. One quick note. His comments weren't malicious or an attempt to disrupt the project, therefore they are not technically vandalism. I have found in cases like this, using the term "vandal" can tend to antagonize the individual to continue. Often a friendly explanation on their talkpage will be sufficient to make them understand that we cannot accept their personal feelings on an issue and they will stop. If they do continue, you can leave a could of sterner warnings, leading to a short block on their IP - for an hour or so. This will almost always do the trick, especially the individual appears to be a child. I just thought I would pass on that hint for future reference. Thanks again for your reversions. Rockpocke t 20:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
You reverted my contribution to Antichrist, and I'd like to know why? Bruce1333 16:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
If it is so original why is the concept continually being brought up in the discussion page. How do you expect Wikipedia to GROW if all you use is what has been written by other men before. Why even have wikipedia if that is your notion?
Bruce1333 16:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
BTW: Any Revert must be first discussed on the discussion page before doing so. Since I have already cleared the article you are doing it wrong according to wiki policy.
Bruce1333 16:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
From God, apparently from the looks of the consensus he DOES get around contrary to populist belief. Why do you ask?
Cheers..
Bruce1333 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm refering to the subject of course which is
"Antichrist" the general consensus on the board is that it is not only one man but could be any man. I was not the first to suggest it, all I did was support it with evidence to the same.
Cheers..
Bruce1333 16:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Apparently you can't tell the difference between supporting an arguement and creating one. That is your problem not mine. Go check my discussion page to find out by what I mean when I say "cleared the article" You could maybe use your resources instead of ask me that is what they are for.
Thanks..
Bruce1333 17:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
That is YOUR POV on what is written, and discussing it is what the discussion page is for. So please do so, if you have any questions
concerning it. Quit deleting it based purely on your POV.
Cheers..
Bruce1333 17:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Huder34 ( talk) 17:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)huder34
i dont mean to sound harsh but do you think you know about this so called end of time?
johhny boy 20:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC) so do you read the bible? Huder34 20:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC) im new at this and was wonder if you could help me out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huder34 ( talk • contribs)
Well i guess i just dont understand it as well as i did before, i mean it just doesnt make that much since because it says how god does everything for a reason and the wicked will be punished but the way i see it they dont get as much punishment as much as the should because well they get to live a good life but most of the christain families i know just can barly pay enough to get food but one thing is for sure they are much happier than the sinners i guess Huder34 14:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I've started an RFC on this user, as he is continuously adding the same block of text into the Antichrist article, to the point where it is becoming disruptive. He has ignored all attempts to communicate with him, so I've started an RFC; Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bruce1333. You talked with the user before, so I thought I'd include you. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 17:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)