If you leave a message for me: I will respond here. Either add this page to your
watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page.
If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, so you don't need to notify me, unless I don't respond when a response is expected.
This prevents the same discussion occurring in multiple stages on multiple pages.
Also
Biteindex is not blatant advertisement as you had tagged it. Please be more careful with your speedy deletion tags. There are strict criteria that an article must meet in order to be eligible. --
kelapstick(
bainuu) 02:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply
While that may be the intention, the writing of the article is not such that it could be deleted via speedy deletion. The text of the tag is:
This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion because in its current form it serves only to promote an entity, person or product, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic.
That is all that matters for speedy deletion, not intent. If you think it should be deleted on notability grounds you would have to use the
PROD or
AfD process. It would probably be deleted via that forum, and you can bring up the advertising issue there if you think it is relevant, however the link to the Wikipedia page would be a pretty weak argument in my opinion. --
kelapstick(
bainuu) 02:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply
The link back to the Wikipedia page was icing on the cake, my concern was the fact that it was an article that exists solely to promote a website. Thanks for your comments, I appreciate you taking the time.
BirdbrainedPhoenix (
talk)
02:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)reply