Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This feels like it should be notable, but the sources just aren't enough to establish that.

Also, most of the content is unreferenced – where is all this information coming from?

And why is it written in such a promotional tone?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Çatma Mescit Hammam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Beyza Yogurtcu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I saw your post on Teahouse about the draft and think you could use some help. I believe your subject is noteworthy and should be up here. If you would like some assistance (Not to worry, I do not charge for this) please let me know and I will oblige Beyza. Geraldine Aino ( talk) 14:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, thank you so much! I want to get all the help I can. The editor mentioned on the Teahouse that I shouldn't add anything without a source, but I believe everything I've written would make a cohesive article on the topic. What would you suggest I do? Can I reach out to you when I need assistance? Beyza Yogurtcu ( talk) 06:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Well I feel the first item to address is the way it is written. The text is ok, just need some formatting👍 Geraldine Aino ( talk) 16:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

i've resubmitted my work here two days ago? could you tell me your feedback on it if possible. it would be much appreciated. thank you! Beyza Yogurtcu ( talk) 14:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Beyza. I still feel that you have some formatting issues and you're not completely compliant with the policies that handle your subject. It's probably a little much to explain in this messaging, but if you allow me, I can edit the article in my sandbox and show you how I would've done it. Geraldine Aino ( talk) 15:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply