Yes, that's odd. But I glanced through my edits in 2007 and couldn't find any point where I discussed Barack Obama. Are you sure? Fishal ( talk) 12:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm quite sure of it, in fact here's how the exchange went:
"And yet you see no problem with subjective sentences in the article such as, "Time magazine's Joe Klein wrote that the book 'may be the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician.'" or, "...Time magazine named him one of 'the world's most influential people.'" as long as he is praised, eh? Blarvink (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)", he said.
"Yes this is outright hype. Some 'fan' got carried away. Strike all these 'fan' statements. They denigrate Wikipedia enormously. I am amused that everyone considers "most liberal" to be a criticism. Let's just add a statement like, "The American Conservative Union rated Obama's voting record as the most liberal of any Senator in 2007 (cite). Fishal (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)," you replied.
I thought about how I'd definitely want to know about that sort of thing if it happened to me, out of morbid curiosity, and decided to mention t to you. BetweenCupsOfTea ( talk) 20:07, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi BetweenCupsOfTea! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
@ BetweenCupsOfTea: Good day, fellow editor. I did caught you've been edited for the main page of the Philippine adaptation of I Can See Your Voice. But i just wanna have to thank you for "cleaning up" the page. Let me explain the definition of ICSYVPH.