![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 14 |
Hi Betty. I don't understand 'cause I'm weak from English, so I'll ask you. Why are they supposed to be red, not purple?
Why are they supposed to be red, not black?
and, why is it supposed to be purple, not red?
and, why are they supposed to be black, not red?
61.109.111.155 ( talk) 03:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Then, what's differences between/among them about age restriction or prohibition?
and, what's meaning of white and yellow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.109.111.155 ( talk) 07:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. 12 vs 12A issue is solved. Left questions are...
What are differences among them about age restriction or prohibition?
and, what's meaning of white and yellow?
61.109.111.155 ( talk) 08:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer. ESRB Rating/South Korea Game Rating(GRAC) issue is solved. Left two questions are...
What are differences among them about age restriction or prohibition?
61.109.111.155 ( talk) 01:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer! 61.109.111.155 ( talk) 08:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I wanna know them also... Are they the same ratings?? (with restriction or prohibiton)
CERO B & C are advisory. Then, are South Korea Rating 12 & 15 advisory??
ESRB M is advisory. Then, is CERO D advisory?? 61.109.111.155 ( talk) 04:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
If it's difficult for you to explain, please answer these 2 question only. You simply can say, "Yes" or "No".
61.109.111.155 ( talk) 11:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, but you said "ESRB M is also advisory" in your answer :( I know that. It's de facto restrictive. So it's red. CERO D, South Korea Game Rating 12 & 15 are also red. but are CERO D, South Korea Game Rating 12 & 15 de facto restrictive, or legally restrictive?(I know AU Game Rating MA15 is legally restrictive.) Maybe this is the final question! I wanna know! 61.109.111.155 ( talk) 07:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) IP, it might be better if you asked your questions at the Teahouse. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 07:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
I've filed a new Dispute resolution noticeboard to address the current consensus dispute on Non-notable awards in the main article of Beauty and the Beast that will rule out a resolution that awards belonging to film critic organizations with direct-linked articles to Wikipedia should be considered as notable awards. You're invited in this resolution to state your reasons. Saiph121 ( talk) 05:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
I may have been grouchy about your rv, or your comments, when I shouldn't have been. So, I'm happy to start over if you are. As for a joint project, as I said, I'm really, really not interested in taking on a thoroughgoing revision of the film pages. I have plenty enough to do now. So, if you're aware of the issue, & if you've got the sources & the time (because you clearly understand this better than me), I'll leave off any further "fixes" of the charts & hope you can manage to clear it all up. IMO, the language issue, for a start, needs addressing, because the boxoffice as listed frequently conflicts with perception: "Jaws" was called "the first $100 million movie"; seeing "The Graduate" & "The Sound of Music" described the same, a decade earlier, is begging for a "correction". I also begin to think the online sources should be avoided entirely, convenient as they are (at least until Variety gets all its back issues up...); as I've said, "lifetime", meaning "one year", & "lifetime" meaning "including several re-releases", at the same source is a recipe for confusion. And not only mine. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 20:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For all your work in sorting out the mess that was in the box office lists. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC) |
Please don't bully other wiki editors as you did regarding the article concerning actress Jenny Agutter or you may be blocked from editing. The text was clear that she "went on to" after her child acting career, so your sarcastic comment was inappropriate and has been reversed. Please be respectful of other editors and refrain from posting demanding statements in articles that have no validity. Wikipedia is a community that allows anyone to freely edit articles and no article should carry any demands or threats made by you or any other editor. 136.179.21.77 ( talk) 20:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
59.14.190.176 user also changed color scheme with Japanese Wikipedia source only. Japanese Wikipedia cannot be source. Please alter them correctly. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 23:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
If you can, please leave detailed comments to 59.14.190.176's talk page. I hope that unsourced changing doesn't happen. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 09:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenny Agutter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty, just gathering your thoughts on this one. I've added this event to Stephen Hendry's list of non-ranking titles (and conversely a runner-up to Steve Davis' list) but I'm beginning to doubt myself. I used the Cuesport book source which I recall you mentioning before. Do you think this title (if it even was a title) should be included? I've read in several places Hendry's pro title count is listed as 74 (including this pushes it up to 75). Andygray110 ( talk) 03:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi i personally don't think this is a professional title it was a series of 3 challenge matches as far as i know. you can look them up on Youtube, at the end of the match no totals were added up to announce Hendry had won 19–11 over a series of 3 events. Regards 31.200.130.86 ( talk) 20:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Andy i asked you on your talkpage if the Cuesport book just listed the 3 stand alone events or did Hayton list a 19–11 result please ?. Do you know Betty by the way ? Regards 31.200.130.86 ( talk) 20:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey. I’m not convinced of the value of the edit you have made, and feel it has removed something of value to the topic. WP:COATRACK isn’t policy, but an essay (albeit a good one), and relates more to having an article on a side topic buried in the body of another article. The list of movies that were there (and for the most part still are) provide useful examples of movies that push the MPAA ratings to the limit. The Martian (film) is a valuable addition due to it being a highly well known and regarded film, and a good example of the two uses of “fuck” as a non-sexual curse in a film. The cited article ( here) goes through this in specific detail. I’d rather not revert the edits, but I’d like you to reconsider the inclusion of this point, and accompanying citation. user:PuppyOnTheRadio 21:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello BL. I saw Dawson City: Frozen Time last night. It is a fascinating film. The balance between straight documentary and art film is like nothing I've seen. While I don't expect anyone to like it as much as I do it is worth seeing for anyone with an interest in film history - and several other histories for that matter :-) Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 20:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Does UK PG recommend parental supervision for children under 8, or for children 8 and over? 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 13:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Half Nelson isn't properly sourced, and this article supports my summary of the film. https://medium.com/cinenation-show/the-power-of-second-chances-in-half-nelson-74587b9602ee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Film Energy ( talk • contribs) 17:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello BL. Do you know about the website that is mentioned as being on the blacklist in this article Michaela Tabb. It is not a tag that I have seen before. As snooker is an area of interest for you I though I would ask. If you don't know about it no worries. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD| Talk 19:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi can you check the above i want to verify it's inclusion. I think it was three challenge matches and do not think it should be included why are they added together ?. Can you view it since you have the book please ?. 92.251.224.222 ( talk) 03:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
But i disagree does it actually say Hendry won 19–11. No it does not. These matches are on Youtube you can clearly watch them no result is given as 19–11. They are played as 3 stand alone events. Money went in and out of the players pockets after every pot. In all fairness i do not think this is a Snooker event. Someone has read that page and just added the 3 legs together to total 19–11, who said that was the right thing to do ?. Can we clarify this somehow please ?. I edit and research lots of events and i have to question about whether this should be added. Regards 92.251.152.23 ( talk) 01:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Well Andy don't speak for Betty then. You two know each other i'm the outsider i get it. It's a talkpage it's good to talk. Im editing events only trying to help like you are ok ?, any questions i have are legitimate ones trying to help not offend or criticize anyone ok 178.167.144.191 ( talk) 02:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I am trying to help it feels like i'm the outsider. I'm just questioning the legitimacy of any event to reach the right result like anyone not criticzing your work by any means, you are doing lots on here i know well and it's appreciated. Good luck 178.167.144.191 ( talk) 02:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Looking at the Youtube videos it seems to talk about the matches being decided by money won i never heard of that have you ?, regards 92.251.197.248 ( talk) 05:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Currently, Motion picture content rating system, Television content rating system, Video game content rating system, Mobile software content rating system, International Age Rating Coalition article uses 5 colors: white, yellow, purple, red, black. But achromatopsia people see purple like #343434, and they see red like #4c4c4c. They can confuse them. Please change color purple to blue. They see blue like #1d1d1d. It doesn't confuse with red. Thank you. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 06:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
In Talk:Motion_picture_content_rating_system#Comparison_Table_Edit_Request, another color-blind user(110) agreed my suggestion. Please edit to my request. I do not wanna bother you. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 09:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Then, what should I do?? By the way, Motion picture rating system article is semi-protected, so I can't edit. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 09:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I assume you know about the situation with the dispute with Armageddon. Users Gareth Griffith-Jones, TheOldJacobite and Beyond My Ken are the problem. Gareth Griffith-Jones and TheOldJacobite have kept removing most of the actors off the infobox, despite those actors are listed in the bulletin box in the theatrical poster, the idea that came from Beyond My Ken and they've been hostile towards the users who oppose those ideas, reverting their non-vandalizing edits and TheOldJacobite keeps on removing the warnings posted by other users in his talk page. Their actions are primarily the reason Armageddon is under full protection due to the dispute and edit warrings. I gonna tell you something needs to be resolved or it might happen again. BattleshipMan ( talk) 17:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
See Talk:Television_content_rating_system. Yellow can be altered as black and red, so we don't have to possess yellow highlighting. 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 13:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Currently, yellow is used for both unrestricted rating and restricted rating, such as [3] revision. (e.g. Taiwan's case) It can make confusion. For AU etc., PG can be allocated as white (no restriction). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 13:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC) If you need "Parental supervision recommended but unrestricted" rating, these color schemes will help you.
211.203.35.206 ( talk) 13:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Articles_with_images_not_understandable_by_color_blind_users suggests white, yellow, red, black, blue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.7.54.147 ( talk) 07:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Plaese change the numbers of Pirates 4 and Pirates 5. Pirates 4 cost between $180-250 milion and not $378 milion. Pirates 5 cost only $230 milion and not $320 milion. You are Fake News Wikipedia. Paperino Mago ( talk) 15:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I added this like restricted highlighting, but it seems unnecessary. This is what I added. Please undo if you can.( Television content rating system) 211.203.35.206 ( talk) 07:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The exact same section you dispute begins with this cited statement:
"The ESRB rating system is primarily enforced on a self-regulatory basis by the video game and retail industries; in markets where it is used, retailers typically enforce the "Mature" rating using photo identification, and refuse to stock video games that have not been rated by the organization, or are rated 'Adults Only'."
Additionally, Canada is, obviously, not subject to the Constitution of the United States.
ViperSnake151 Talk 03:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Octopussy, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Betty can you remove Rhys from the above players wiki page please ?. WS lists him as Jamie Clarke as does the EBSA as he has won their playoffs to turn professional. his twitter account lists him as Jamie Clarke and Hermund from Snooker.org contacted Jamie himself and was told that he wants to be known as Jamie Clarke. Snooker.org are removing Rhys from their records. i hope you can help ?. regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.183.141 ( talk) 13:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
of course its possible there are plenty of Mark King's also. we just need a Jamie Clarke snooker player. why cant we remove the rhys like we did in the sunny akani page ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.183.141 ( talk) 15:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
can we change it from Jamie Rhys Clarke to Jamie Clarke (snooker player) then it would be much better ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.189.174 ( talk) 16:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty I looked this up and World Snooker was in charge of the Open Tour until the end of the 2002/2003 season. You said it was the EASB that ran it. Open Tour was not classed as a pro-am it was treated like the modern day PTC'S were except they were non ranking events. I told you snooker historian counts these as non ranking events. Can we contact World Snooker to clarify this issue please ?. Regards 178.167.223.245 ( talk) 23:34, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I find very confusing about this article [ here] This is regard to an edit made by User:Maestro2016 on this [ post] He added another box for "International market" and posted figures for three countries - India, Soviet Union, United Kingdom. For Indian movie Disco Dancer, he mentioned domestic grossing figures from its origin country + the grossing figures this movie made in Soviet Union according to his unofficial [ calculations] which he made by himself. For Soviet Union movie Sportloto-82, he mentioned its country’s only domestic figure and UK film Gandhi-1982 he mentioned both Domestic and International figure. Why is that figures for North American movies in the 1st table are domestic figures [ see] and for the International table, the figures for 3 countries are jumbled up both with both domestic and foreign grossing figures made outside of its country of origin. If you take for example, Jurassic park ‘s domestic figure is $359,197,037 but it made $357,800,000 outside North America with total worldwide gross of $792,910,554. This is more box office gross than the films mentioned in International table. Then why not mention this movie in International table? I feel only domestic figures should be mentioned for them just like North American table. Similar editing was made here [ 1973],[ 1967], [ 1966] I hope you look into this matter. -- Chintu89 ( talk) 11:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
For comments at ANI. Sometimes I'm my own worst enemy, but what is done is done. Appreciate you taking a few moments out of your editing time for me. Thanks again! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Trump and M. Williams now (after World Championship) have 533 and 439 centuries, respectively. That is what I saw (statistics shown on screen) and heard (from the mouth of commentators) during broadcast on Eurosport, at least. If they are mistaken, then I am mistaken too. – KWiki ( talk) 09:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Snooker World Championship broadcast, Eurosport, [time and date of broadcast]
so editors & readers know you have got them from somewhere legit.
Betty Logan (
talk)
13:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)I edit that page after reading this article of The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/may/15/avengers-infinity-war-overtakes-dark-knight-at-box-office-is-it-uk-biggest-superhero-film ਬੱਬੂ ਬਰਾੜ ( talk) 10:55, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adults Only, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page R18 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty. There is a Vandal on the world Seniors site. He keeps making the same edit from multiple ips and it is the only edit made on these ips which tells me enough. How can we stop this please ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 12:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Betty if you edit it or leave a note on the page it would be better. This person seems to think the Seniors Tour is associated with the main tour and and keeps changing it. I have pointed out the Seniors Tour is a tour in its own right like in golf but he won't listen can you leave an edit please ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 20:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
He keeps saying main tour players are ineligible and keeps changing it. Does he not realise the Seniors is a tour in its own right ?. This is very frustrating. Can you put a semi lock and explain this to the person please ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 20:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
So, only amateur (non-tour) players were eligible to play since 2018. "Non-ranking events" is a terminology used for events with pro players (otherwise, Q-School, IBSF championships are the non-ranking events also). 46.211.133.186 ( talk) 20:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I pointed this out on another talk page. The World Seniors Tour is a tour in its own right it is not linked to the main tour. The legends 6 to 8 of them play the qualifiers in the tournament proper after they qualify. You seem to think this has something to do with the main tour it does not. It is like the senior tour in golf. Editors and moderators on here class them as non-ranking wins on the Seniors Tour 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 22:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The World Seniors Tour only started last season you are having a real problem understanding that. 4 events Jimmy White and Ken Doherty they are main tour players they played in the final of one of the Seniors events. The Seniors Tour was created by Jason Francis of Snooker Legends you are missing the point. It had nothing to do with the WPBSA Buthe they are joining forces with himy this season OK? . 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 22:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
But you are not listening the World Seniors Tour was set up since then what are you talking about ? 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Betty we all discussed this on the Snooker talk pages that World Seniors Tour events should be non-ranking events. You were happy with that am I right ?. I checked it today ? 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 22:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The only reason Jimmy White and Ken Doherty did not enter into the Championship is because they were already qualifying through the main tour. You are not getting away from the fact you think it's tied to the main tour. What will your answer be when the WPBSA runs it next year . 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Plus it's called the World Seniors Championship on the World Seniors Tour not the amateur tour. 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Betty can you just tell me if you view the Seniors Snooker tour as non ranking events wins please ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
They were Senior Tour events which were created by Jason Francis in 2017 with other events so why all of a sudden would these two be amateur and the others senior non-ranking titles makes no sense ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
So will we leave them as non-ranking as they were in previous years? . It was agreed at the start including by yourself that all Seniors events were non ranking events wins. You can view the talkpage ?. Regards 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
They are not pro-am either. Do you understand why Francis put the word amateur in he wanted people to play legends on a Seniors Tour for senior players can you not get that. You are thrown by that one line in all of this
178.167.134.252 (
talk)
23:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Even Betty pointed out amateur players can play the legends in Special Senior Tour events they are not amateur and only you thinks they are. 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 00:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Betty why throw pro-am out to really complicated things this was consented to including yourself that it was to be called non ranking instead of creating another section to add these finals ? 178.167.134.252 ( talk) 23:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitationals I say Betty the General Cup was a non ranking events. The WPBSA are running this next year with Snooker Legends and the will be non-ranking ranking invitational events. Will I put in non ranking events (Amateur legs). ? 178.167.134.252 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Surreal Barnstar |
Had to do this… couldn’t resist it.
You’ve done a magnificent job on the time you’ve spent editing and protecting Wikipedia. I hope and pray you succeed greatly in your life. Surge_Elec ( talk) 21:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Betty Logan,
I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join New Page Patrol, and from your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; we could use some additional help from an experienced user like yourself.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR.
Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 21:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
If you use the "accessdate=" parameter, it is REQUIRED that you have a URL filled in. If not, the article will show up in an error report which is where it came to my attention. /info/en/?search=Category:Pages_using_citations_with_accessdate_and_no_URL As best I know, the problem can be remedied (in this case) by either changing (page= to url=), or removing the date from the "accessdate=" parameter. Gene Wilson ( talk) 22:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
I know this is your personal talk page and not the talk page for Motion picture content rating system. But you seem to be the most active there, plus that you seem to be more knowledgeable about the structure, so I wanted to contact you directly.
I have tried understanding how the table is supposed to work, but I can't really understand how it works. Swedish rating 15 is black for 11–14 and red for 15–21, which I understood as black messaging there are conditions that are applied whilst red isn't. But looking at Turkey, this isn't the case. Here the 15+ and 15A are both 15–21. So following how it is on Turkey, Swedish should be Btl 0–6, 7 (red) 7–10, 11 (red) 11–14, 15 (red) 15–21. – But if you do want to add the information of when a rating first is allowed even accompanied by an adult, I still think
my version does the job. Because currently, why isn't there a black 7 from 0–6? Why is there a red 11 from 15–21 when no other rating is stretching beyond the next rating? The same is done on Norway where the red 12 is going beyond 15, but ends at 18. On Denmark, the purple 7 goes beyond 11 and 15, where 11 could have been two rows like the Norwegian 18. I also don't understand the alternating colours, the chess pattern, that is used on Norway and Sweden.
Liggliluff (
talk)
02:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Would you say a consensus has already been established regarding the poster for The Birth of a Nation yet, so we can change it back? 24.18.128.102 ( talk) 01:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Okay but you gotta change that for its sequel. Shayaan Raza ( talk) 15:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Just wondering if you were aware of this...? - theWOLFchild 23:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Regarding film production companies.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
17:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
The simple answer if if people will visit the page, there should be a page. Purist level two would be to say if enough people visit the page to make the crowdsourcing effect accurate, there should be a page. After all, it takes a certain number of eyeballs to evolve away bad edits. The other way to see it is how influential the topic/movie was. But it’s hard to argue that anything with a wide release, a twenty million dollar budget, and three hundred people involved in making it isn’t influential enough to allow a volunteer to write a paragraph about it. All major motion pictures are part of the zeitgeist.
If it doesn’t make its money back at the box office it is a bomb. There are films that were box office stinkers but were money makers in secondary markets of home video and games for various and sundry reasons. BornonJune8 ( talk) 12:00, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#The New Adventures of Pippi Longstocking sources.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
18:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm not going to argue it. I found a source that contradicted what was posted & used it. If you've got better sourcing, or better info, I'll happily let you use it. I'd just like for there to be some agreement on what is & isn't the "box office" of a film for a year, or ever, because nobody seems to have a damn clue. I certainly don't anymore. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 22:43, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty. I did some digging, and found this thread, which lead me to this. Should work now! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Mind if telling me what difference between age recommendation (e.g. PG-13 in US), age half-prohibition (e.g. R in US) and age prohibition (e.g. NC-17 in US)? Zenkaino lovelive ( talk) 01:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I asked about functionality. In other words, how they are practically applied differently. Zenkaino lovelive ( talk) 02:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Mind if telling me if all restricted ratings are all-okay for older audiences? For example, I wonder if all 12A-rated (UK) films are all-okay for 12+ or if all 15-rated (UK) films are all-okay for 15+. Zenkaino lovelive ( talk) 02:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your revert on my change of poster size -- not being sarcastic, it gave me a clue that someone my thumbnail setting had gooten changed from the standard 220 down to 150, which explains a lot of what I was seeing. Without your edit summary, I probably wouldn;t have realized. Best, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 19:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Source [4] and source [5] [6] is confusing. [7] says "M" is set at 16 but [8] [9] says "M" is set at 10. Therefore, what is followed? Zenkaino lovelive ( talk) 09:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
In /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Question_about_name_usage_over_at_Interstellar_(film) you state that you sympathize with the issue of potential sexism in calling all adult female scientists (Murph Cooper and Amelia Brand) just by their first name ("Murph" and "Amelia"), while in the same context calling all their male counterparts by their last name. You stated "we shouldn't obfuscate plot details to correct the inherent sexist bias of the subject". I agree it would be obfuscating to call "Amelia Brand" just "Brand" (as the credits do), but I consider using "Murph Cooper" and "Amelia Brand" (the proposal under discussion) both a necessary disambiguation as well as respectful. -- Vigilius ( talk) 14:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Motion picture content rating system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Office of Film and Literature Classification ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Superman in AIDES campaign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 05:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty, could you weigh in on this topic here? I think its relevant to your interests and you seem to be pretty level headed when discussing it. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#Request_for_Comment:_Is_it_relevant_to_list_all_production_companies_or_just_main_animation_studios_in_the_infobox_of_film_articles? Thanks! Andrzejbanas ( talk) 19:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please check if Christopher Robin bombed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:197:C180:13A5:C1E9:EACF:B975:4CCF ( talk) 19:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Betty, I see your version is actually much better, my apologies. Have you blocked me from editing? That wouldnt be so cool 2 days before the championship !! I was going to leave a message saying I was pleased with the new version, start using that myself.
James Kevin McMahon (
talk)
12:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
@ James Kevin McMahon: You are welcome James. I haven't blocked you because you haven't done anything wrong! I just reverted you because there is a much better way of adding archived links, and that probably just automatically triggered the notification system. Betty Logan ( talk) 12:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Betty, as a senior editor you should know Wikipedia does not work by a random 2-1 majority rule but by reliable sources and consensus building. I recently found out that there is a whole book dedicated to the claim Hitler was not a vegetarian. I believe you are very much personally involved in arguing there is no dispute and urge you the second time to leave this matter as it is. Or we can ask for Wikipedia:Mediation.
Sincerely, 08:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateo ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for helping me figure out the google book pieces. Smasongarrison ( talk) 16:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Betty Logan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Betty Jamie's homepage was changed back to Jamie Rhys Clarke when the player himself has clearly stated his name is Jamie Clarke. Can this redirect be changed back please ?. 77.75.241.2 ( talk) 17:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know how to do that. It was changed to Jamie Clarke but your friend Armbrust changed it to a redirect for no reason. Can you look into it please ?. Regards 92.251.140.119 ( talk) 17:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I do not want your nonsense on my talk page too. So stop it, or you will be reported to an admin for fasely accusing and harassing. Sebastian James ( talk) 19:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
As you know I have been considering this users unblock request. One of the restrictions I am considering as part of this unblock request is to have editors "monitor" his edits (look at them to check them) to ensure that he is not slipping back to what got him blocked in the first place. Would you be prepared to do this?-- 5 albert square ( talk) 09:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Happy Christmas! | |
Hello Betty Logan, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 08:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Xmas |
Merry Xmas and Happy New Year! Thanks for all your help :) 5 albert square ( talk) 19:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas to all of you too. Hope you all have a pleasant holiday! Betty Logan ( talk) 18:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
![]() |
... gan yr hen Gymro; rwy'n gobeithio eich bod wedi cael gwyliau Nadolig gwych ac rwy'n dymuno 2019 heddychlon i chi! That is Welsh and translates to: Spicy hot wine for you from the old Welshman; I hope you have had a great Christmas holiday and I wish you a peaceful 2019! Thank you for your excellent work on the 'pedia. Sincerely, Gareth Griffith-Jones ( contribs) ( talk) 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |