You seem to have done a lot of work on the Muslim Brotherhood article. There is a dispute on the Muslim Association of Britain page about whether it is a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood. If you have any information on this issule please could you contribute to the page. -- JK the unwise 09:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
AI, I'd like to resolve our disagreement about Muslim Brotherhood; please read my comments on that article's talk page. -- Beroul 09:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi Beroul. I posted this on one of the MB talk pages, but thought i would post it to you personally since you obviously have quite the interest. The first one (the pdf) is very good. The second one is not so 'scholarly', but it sheds light on the shift the MB has chosen for its operation.
Bassemkhalifa 12:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions
best J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.157.144.220 ( talk) 15:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Beroul, I do not think it is fair at all that the article on the Muslim Brotherhood can exclude any criticism, yet any articles related to my religion ( Scientology) is loaded with non-academic criticism, opinions and disinformation. Please help to rewrite those articles or at least tell the POV contributors there to follow the same standard as you have set in the Muslim Brotherhood articles. Peace. -- AI 20:02, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Excellent work on the Muslim Brotherhood series of articles. I have a question though. Why are there line breaks about every fifty characters in the source text? This makes editing very difficult for me, as I have to arrow down line by line to edit pages, using a screen reader, as can be seen on my user page. I've just spent time removing the line breaks at History of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (1939-1954), but the process is tedious, and I wouldn't like to do it to all the articles. Is there a reason why you have done things this way, or is there a way of removing all the redundant line breaks? Graham 09:36, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I just recently switched the citation style in the article Hassan al Banna and the article on the History of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria from Harvard referencing to Footnotes. I hadn't realized that there were guidelines that encouraged not changing them from one to the other. Before doing anything else I'll wait for a response, since you're the main contributor to these articles. Thanks, Joshdboz 14:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi!
-
Metamusing
04:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I'be been toying for a long time with trying to re-write the Islamism page which is just chock-full of hyperbole. It's very opinionated and suffers from the expected cpnflict between the anti-Terrorists and the Islamic defenders. A daunting task, no doubt. I thought it would be close to impossible to write something measured, academic and informative on such a controversy-sparking topic. That is, until i came accross your MB history page. Great work. I hope you, or someone else, could put a similar effort into the Islamism page and rectify all the untruths about it and related topics such as salafism, wahhabism and so forth.
forgot to sign: Bassemkhalifa 10:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Your help and expertise would be greatly appreciated on this topic. A reading of orientalism would be a good background to some of the problems with this article. Also these links are useful, but keep getting removed or edited out: [1] [2] [3] [4] Aaliyah Stevens 17:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The Logo was cited in the information for the image itself from the ADL. It's also well established that it is the logo. If you ever seen one of their offices, it's prominently displayed on the outside of buildings. Angrynight 23:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)