Hello, Bejakyo. Thank you for your work on Outback (lesbian newsletter). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 ( talk) 18:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ North8000: Thank you very much for the review! Looking forward to being able to expand the article

Bejakyo ( talk) 23:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Luke Akehurst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proposed French Sixth Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flammarion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 19:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Bejakyo! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Green Party of England and Wales several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Green Party of England and Wales, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 10:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply