This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit this archive page. To start a new discussion or revive an old one, please use the current talk page. | ![]() |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 |
![]() |
Today: DYK #1700, and I uploaded more images, mostly blue and green, for hope. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Today, mostly black&white, and standing upright as Psalm 15 says -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Today: see yourself, read about a hymn praying to not be on earth in vain, about a comics artist whose characters have character (another collaboration of the "perennial gang", broken by one of us banned), and in memory of the last prima donna assoluta, Edita Gruberová. I had to go to two grave sites last week, one who died now, one who died 10 years ago, so standing upright and in black seems appropriate. More colours - but subdued - can be had on hikes, - updated. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Today: memories in friendship -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
I wouldn't try to understand what I was saying any more than you have to. Basically I was offering two approaches. If Adamant is the "threat" that a lot of commenters seem to suggest they are, which is an open possibility, then a simple ban from AfD discussions only "kicks the can down the road", so to speak. They will be back at AN/I for some other disruption that is relative to this issue, maybe hostile comments on article talk pages or something like that. But if they are acting in good faith, just misguided in how they deal with others during those discussions, then some specific sanctions are warranted. I just happen to believe they aren't the "threat" that a lot of others think they are and a full sanction will be more a detriment to a good faith editor that is misguided than a more refined and specific topic related ban would be. Maybe it's my "ever the optimist" approach or maybe it's something more, idk. But my comment was never meant to take blame off Adamant or to suggest anyone with a different opinion isn't justified to take that approach. Thank you for accepting my apology. -- ARose Wolf 14:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
I hope you are well.
Not sure if you recall, but you participated in a previous appeal to my topic ban. To my disappointment, you did not support my appeal. I currently am appealing again at the administrators noticeboard. I hope that the concerns you expressed may be lessened or completely alleviated this time around. If not, I would appreciate you share what concerns you have with me so I can address them to you before you reach a verdict if you chose to. I look forward to conducting a dialogue with any inquiries you may have.
Best regards SecretName101 ( talk) 18:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mr. @ Begoon:. I think the following svg logos you created need some modifications.
These badges are wrong in design and colour.
Fyi: The four stars in the badge of BEHS (9) Mandalay symbolize the four houses of School Council.
There is also banner form of that badge(s).
Reference images:
နေနီဝန်း ( talk) 10:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)