If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Tony thanks but logs and my warning message at
article's talk page are enough to support the idea that I am genuinely trying to prevent someone who does not seem (or does he?) know what they re doing to sabotage an article. I have touch based with the relevant persons listed in the talk page to address the issue.
Removing all the additional content that had been logged is pure vandalism so YES I am currently talking to Juergen and Ali.Ahmed, YES we will document the talk page, though we don't have a lot of time to waste so any well-intentioned "editor" should behave and add relevant comments such as "missing source" or whatever and NOT throw away the content, YES whenever one has time it's going reach the Consensus desk, and YES should you try and curse we with the "blocking policy" little whip, all of THAT will be my very first topic upon arrival in Amsterdam this November 21st.
Balayka (
talk)
00:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)reply
A summary of some important site policies and guidelines
Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not change others' comments. New comments go at the bottom, under the comments they are responding to.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.