Please stop disruptively editing as you have done on the Indian Air Force page. Trying to circumvent Wikipedia standards, with illegitimate excuses is unconstructive and severs no one. If you continue down this route you will be blocked from editing -Thank you FOX 52 talk! 14:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
do NOT revert again edit warring will get you blocked - FOX 52 talk! 20:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Indo-Aryan migrations, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Indian Air Force. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that
Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 talk! 00:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
User:Bairagi Ram
I have noticed your recent edits to certain Wikipedia pages related to the Indian Armed Forces, some of which have stood in stark contrast to edits made by others. In accordance, I've noted you've continuously reinstated the supposed flag of India's Ministry of Defence (MoD) onto its
Wiki page. However, do note:
This shall be the final time I will pull down the flag from the Wiki page; if you do have any evidence to support the so-called MoD flag, do share it, or else this will have to marked as an edit war, as your continuous reverting violates the three-revert rule.
I hope you understand, and will not reinstate something which has been pulled done for good reason. Silver Pavilion ( talk) 12:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Silver Pavilion ( talk) 12:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katoch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suryavanshi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate images, as you did at Research and Analysis Wing, you may be blocked from editing. You removed the notice and put an image against that notice, this act was disruptive. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 07:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Research and Analysis Wing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 04:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Bairagi Ram and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Research and Analysis Wing, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of
my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention --
User4edits (
T)
05:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop disruptively editing as you have done on the Indian National Congress page. Trying to circumvent Wikipedia standards, with illegitimate excuses is unconstructive and severs no one. Please use article talk page for any discussion. If you continue down this route you will be blocked from editing -Thank you ZenDragoX ( User) | ( Contact) 12:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
18:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Bairagi Ram ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am requesting to be unblocked from editing the article about
Indian National Congress. @
Zendrago X: is wrongfully adding the colours of the party in the infobox. I asked them to provide any reference for their claim, but they did not do so and just kept undoing my edits.
19 May,
25 May,
29 May
The wrong colours were added on 6 May by @
German2000: in
this edit. A month have not even passed since the new colours were added, before that the blue colour was there for years. So there is no reason to call my edits as vandalism.
If there should be a discussion on the article's talk page regarding the colours then the version of the article (mainy the colours) which was before 6 May should be published until consensus is reached.
Bairagi Ram (
talk)
08:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't need access to the article itself to discuss the edits on the talk page. You'll need to show us that you won't edit war before being given access to the article. 331dot ( talk) 08:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As long as your ancestors are not British, what's the need to edit Wikipedia history to adjust to British viewpoint? As long as the ancestors of Indians are the same old seafarers who from BCE are into building ships and maintaining a Navy, there is no need to confirm to British viewpoints as they do in Australia and NZ. I request that you acknowledge your ancestors to be Indians and not British. Thanks. Mifiin ( talk) 02:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Empire (Indian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindustani.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noble Eightfold Path, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashtanga.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
15:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Hello Bairagi Ram. I see you deleted the information I added to the main box of the Wikipedia Sanskrit page. You must know I wasn't intending to troll or spread disinformation. Not all unsourced edits are trolling. I am a student of linguistics and a lover of linguistics and world history. And I am new to Wikipedia and what's more, a disaster with tech. I didn't add a reference simply because I just learnt how to add one on visual editing and I really have no idea of how to add one on code editing.You are not the first one to delete one of my edits just because of that. You all could have chosen to verify my information on internet, but you didn't. And I am sure that once you see a source,many of you chill and don't even corroborate the information on a search, something I would have done, by the way. It was as easy as to look for "Sanskrit in Tibet/Mongolia". So it would be very kind of you if you restored my edits including the following information in the box; I will provide you with two sources (I would do it myself but I don't know how to do it and I'm afraid someone will again delete my efforts): -South Asia (since the 14th/4th century BCE )
- Indianised Southeast Asia ( since 250 BCE)
-Greater Tibet (since the 7th century AD)
-Greater Mongolia (since the 16th century AD)
-Ancient Central Asia (Classical and Late Antiquity to Early Medieval Period)
That is all. I really hope you can help it. It took some time to do this and I don't know how to do it alone. Here are the sources:
https://books.google.com/books?id=sluKZfTrr3oC&printsec=frontcover&dq=buddhism+in+central+asia&hl=ca&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-sLm88q6HAxXVgf0HHdqtDkAQ6AF6BAgHEAM Marcgsch ( talk) 20:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)