I just got your message. I'm not sure which articles I've contributed to have a "medical" rating, perhaps spider venom? (That's an interesting field because venom testing on humans would be unethical and different mammals react in radically different ways to the various toxins.) Anyway, I'll be glad to help.
The sociology of developing an article should really make an interesting study. It can be a very pleasant collaborative process or a viper pit.
I got your message as well. I gather that it's due to my involvement with articles on
smoking, which has indeed been quite extensive. However, I feel that the information I've added has had limited relevance to medicine. Most of what I've worked on has been in the realm of sociology and cultural history. My interest in medicine is rather limited and my education has been in the fields of history and linguistics. If you still feel my participation is relevant, just drop a note at my talkpage.