This is an archive of past discussions with Avraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - ... (up to 100) |
Hi Avi. Thanks very much for soliciting my input. I hope my response will be understood as stern and not disrespectful, in light of your efforts. You're dealing with the NPOV problem quite well at the level of tone, and I respect that, but I confess to being mildly frustrated that the sourcing and notability issues I've raised multiple times on the talk page aren't being dealt addressed.-- G-Dett ( talk) 22:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Just read the article, I've got it open in a window now. I clicked right thorugh form the footnote I put onthe page. It 's pretty simple, lists Rashid as one of the three surviving sons. What were you looking for.? Historicist ( talk) 21:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist
review Chaim Walkin and rate it on the discussion page, if you think it's the right thing to do.-- Korach ( talk) 03:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
GraemeLeggett ( talk · contribs) (No relation) is caught up in this range block. I know the block is causing difficulties and you're convinced that it's for the good of the project. You might want to arrange an exemption for him if he's not one of the suspected sock puppets. I don't know much about the case in question, so it's probably best for you to look at it. -- GraemeL (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
At my leisure, I'm going through all the well known Palestinians articles looking for unsourced smears and WP:UNDUE, so you don't have to email me at my talk to find out what i'm up to... We need a "critics of Israel" category to make it easier to go through all those articles and clean them up, as I've done haphazardly with ones I've run into in my internet/email travels. Unless there is one. Should I ask on Collaboration if can't find? Carol Moore 15:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Please see [1]-- Peter cohen ( talk) 21:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Avraham,
A couple of requests have come up regarding the very similar range blocks, so can you confirm these shouldn't be created or create the accounts? Here are the links: [2] and [3]. If you need to, feel free to email me.
Thanks,
The Helpful One 14:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for completing the CU, Avraham. I was only concerned with the fact that it mystified me how 2 (seemingly unrelated) editors, neither who have admin powers, could recreate the page in exactly the same way with the same wording without them being the same person.
As you say the technical evidence indicates that its unlikely, does that include an IP check, or other way of testing, or is that pretty much it for the case? I'm not attempting to query your judgement, simply trying to understand the process itself. Thanks for your help and support. Thor Malmjursson ( talk) 04:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Avraham, I noticed that on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date Linking RFC you opposed the deprecation of linking dates for autoformatting purposes without a reason. I just want to know why you oppose that. Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 19:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
According to sources in the article, he is a member of an Orthodox synagogue. Is that not enough for the cat?-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Your checkuser block. Thought I would let you respond to the unblock request. Later. -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 02:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
is hereby awarded to Avi for being so kind and wasting his precious WP time resolvng my archiving problems. brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. My silly real-life caught up with me. Thanks so much for helping with me with my archives. Its much better now. Yes you can delete that one messed up page. Two questions: I now have two archive boxes. One on the top and one on the side. Can the top one be "merged" with the side one? Also, shouldn't the November 2008 archive show up already on the archives? Thanks, -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
You are edit warring a BLP vio with this edit. [4] Please show good faith, self-revert, and rejoin the consensus discussions, which you are no doubt aware of. If you do not I will. 02:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind reviewing the situation at Talk:Gemma Haines? User:Daniel claims that we have received a OTRS request (though he hasn't cited a ticket number) complaining of "distress" caused by the presence of {{ notability}} and {{ primarysources}} tags on the article and that that justifies their removal. Jfire ( talk) 16:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I hope that you have the patience ot read the posting re: our Demon. After being called on stalling tactics, he agreed to a concensus, after being called on posting material not in the concensus, he backed off again. I truly percieve a pattern of endless stalling as a straategy. I am not certain what set of wikipedia rules it violates. Perhaps he should be arned or reprimanded. I do think this information is worth working to get on the page. I'll be back to support you tomorrow. Historicist ( talk) 03:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist