This is an archive of past discussions with Avraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - ... (up to 100) |
<Barnstar moved to section on userpage>
Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. -- Shark face 217 20:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
sorry, i felt bad when I saw the tag after making my edit. Good luck with your project.-- Chakira ( talk) 06:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I really like it how jews try to Hagana over the net when they encounter people who are critical of the zionist nuclear weapons manufacturing programme at Dimona and militarism in general (and the general oppression of arabs and the occupied Palestinian territories). This is shameless censorship, which only creates more hostile feelings towards the jewry and sympathy for the plight of Holyland arabs.
Zionists receive many billions of dollars in military and economic aid each year from USA, therefore jews should respect basic american values, especially the First Amendment right to the freedom of speech, instead of trying to censor the net. 82.131.210.162 ( talk) 09:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Ping. Rudget ( review) 16:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Avi
Can you explain the criteria you used to divide "confirmed" from "suspected" sockpuppets? I have previously been told that the use of anonymisers and proxies makes checkuser inappropriate here. If you are going by content and MO, I can see no difference between the IDs in each category. Can we mark them all as confirmed?
I don't know if you have seen them, but I suggest that you also look at Truthprofessor, Zuminous and Borisyy, who all seem to operate in the same manner and can safely be assumed to be part of the same operation. I have identified so far 2615 abusive edits from 474 different IDs, not including dozens of libellous edits deleted from history but probably available to admins. Is there anything more we can do to put a stop to this? RolandR ( talk) 13:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:AAA 40Year Logo.PNG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 17:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:ASI logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 20:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)