Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Asdfindia", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are
promotional or have the appearance of
shared use. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to
create a new account or request a
username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our
conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. -- Mufka
(u)
(t)
(c)
18:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Please read WP:COI. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Can the user reveal his membership ID? I don't find any such member existing in our internal database! Requested not to play with the names of our office people. All the names quoted above are in a way or other relating to our office members. Pdykkh007 ( talk) 19:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:26, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdfindia for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754
19:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Asdfindia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No connection with either the association or its President. As a member, I wanted the same information to be online
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: no response to Bwilkins below. Max Semenik ( talk) 21:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You will definitely need to change this username, as it fails the username policy. Here are a few key questions:
You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 12:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your ethical action Bwilkins Pdykkh007 ( talk) 19:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. Kokula Krishna Hari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Kokula Krishna Hari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs ( talk) 02:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Scientists, Developers and Faculties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Scientists, Developers and Faculties until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs ( talk) 02:55, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
The file File:ASDF India Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned file, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jon Kolbert (
talk)
14:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)