Hello! I'm
Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page
Megalith appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been
reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Belbury (
talk)
09:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
My English isn't very good and I just couldn't think of a more accurate expression. This may be a brazen request, but it would be a great help if you could fix the mistake instead of reverting it.
Argument cat (
talk)
09:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
As I said in the edit summary, describing
Shimao as a "megalithic settlement" appears to be incorrect, to me! The Shimao article doesn't use the term, and the photos in it don't appear to show megalithic structures.
Belbury (
talk)
10:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I have a curtain that opens and closes depending on which of two cords you pull. I don't know what it is, but when a choice is exactly 50/50, I'm 100% sure to pick the wrong one. signed, Willondon (
talk)
01:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
..I didn't pay much attention to sources because I thought spreading knowledge was a worthy priority. Your comment made me realize that it is not just only the body of knowledge or information itself that is important in now. ..
Being collaborative project to depend on
WP:RS is structural need and limitation both for Wikipedia and Wikipedians have to live with. Huge amount of negotiation and proving (and many times still not being accepted by community) to add even a single word can be very normal.
If you noticed, at the RFC other user said "..I appreciate the notification, but I'm afraid that I am out of my depth here in this conversation. I am not well versed in the cited secondary sources being discussed. ..". Many times people need very long time to study and go through and react knowledgeably and we need to give time. Creating RfC, of course decision largely remains yours, without having enough users knowing nuances may not help but waiting for another day before creating the RfC may help more at times.
Waiting for another day:For example my suggestions on
RfC etiquette though are very constructive other user did not agree on pretext generally users do not read help pages properly and even some do not use ideally. Did I argue back, no I left it for another day. During COVID times I wanted importance of Mask to be more stressed then what was there in the article but other users did not agree. This is collaborative project, its not that every time other users will agree. Many times waiting for another day can be better strategy.