Why did you vote delete here by providing an argument it is covered in another source? Did you mean keep?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited San Clemente, Ecuador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manabí ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I Thank you for protecting the article Sand Shark I salute you, you have made my day :) PBASH607 ( talk) 21:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Huh. According to my watchlist, he vandalized my page at the exact moment he was blocked. Actually, it says he vandalized it after he was blocked. Weird. Anyways, thanks for the revert. :) —  Francophonie&Androphilie^{( Je vous invite à me parler)} 23:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Angrysockhop. Can you explain this? The user has continued to do the same sort of thing, and several editors have seen it as vandalism. A block is almost certain to come very soon, unless it can be explained how the editing is constructive. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Certainly. The dispute originated with User:92.251.118.49 adding " freedom speeches", apparently short phrases or exclamations said by winners of the game. I thought he was engaging in vandalism because of the apparent irrelevance and nonsensical structure of his edits, but it was actually a well-meant attempt at adding what the user believed to be relevant content. Were his edits useful, needed, or encyclopedic? Probably not. But they were not vandalism, which is what I accused him of. Angrysockhop ^{( talk to me)} 08:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for clarifying that. It would have helped if the user had provided edit summaries, or replied to talk page messages to explain the situation. I see that you suggested using edit summaries, but to no avail. JamesBWatson ( talk) 17:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing— Heat bending of wood—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. E x nihil ^{( talk)} 07:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply