Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Maitreya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Sudo
Ghost
22:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Maitreya. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Sudo
Ghost
09:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at
Maitreya, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Sudo
Ghost
02:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Look, it doesn't matter how many times you add this individual to the Maitreya article, it will always be removed. Every time it's been added, it is either unsourced or sourced to the individual's own website, which doesn't satisfy the question of this being a notable claim. If this were a notable claim, it would need a third-party reliable source showing that this is a relevant individual in terms of the article. The lack of such a source indicates that this is not a notable individual in terms of relevance to the Maitreya article. If you continue to add the content to the article, you will be reported for edit warring and very likely blocked from editing.
If you feel this individual needs a mention on the article, you're more than welcome to start a discussion on the article's talk page and provide any third-party sources that would back up that assertion. However, simply re-adding the content to the article will not achieve the results you're looking for; the article is on the watchlists of several editors, and we can see whenever the article is changed, and the content will simply be removed upon discovery because what is being added to the article does not appear to belong in the article. Again, if you disagree you're more than welcome to discuss it on the talk page, but please do not attempt to reinsert it into the article. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 06:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 06:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
De728631 (
talk)
12:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angkorangel for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sudo Ghost 05:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)