Hello, I'm
FoxtAl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
FoxtAl (
talk)
06:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
FoxtAl. Your recent edit(s) to the page
List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been
reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. This is your second warning. Please refrain, else you would be reported admin panel. Thank you
FoxtAl (
talk)
07:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft, you may be
blocked from editing. Please don't edit Wikipedia with
WP:SPS such as Quwa.org, also don't remove citation and add factual errors like you did here [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_active_Pakistan_Air_Force_aircraft&diff=1082468434&oldid=1082453358 ]. Also note that if you add a source to back up your claim, the source added should "clearly" state the claim; else your edit would be counted as
WP:OR which is not encouraged on Wikipedia. I hope you understand. Happy editing.
FoxtAl (
talk)
04:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. This edit summary worries me, An Asphalt. Are you saying that Indian sources (with WP:NOENG in mind) are inherently non-credible? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Where is the mention of 144kn ab thrust of ws-10B engine,in this citation which is given by you. Dl ff ( talk) 12:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
You blindly removed my changes from Al -zarrar tank ,go and read sources, there is no mention of 750 (tank), source no.1 mentioned there are 320 units were produced as of 2012,The second source claiming 500 building as of 2021-22.type -59 has different page where it's mentioned 'pakistan operating 600 t-59 tanks' don't mix it. Dl ff ( talk) 12:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
List of equipment of the Pakistan Army, you may be
blocked from editing.
Technopat (
talk)
06:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Technopat, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Technopat (
talk)
06:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
you are blindly undoing my changes,if there are 750 tanks are produced than give source and cite it,the tank is still in production it doesn't mean 750 tanks are in service,the given source contains number of 500 so it should be on main page,and I also gave the one source of 2021Y, there are 1100(t-59/al zarrar) tanks are in service of pakistani army it's mentioned in many reliable sources,out of them 600 are t-59 and 500 Al zarrar,if there 750 al zarrar produced than there are 350 type-59 tanks are in service.Don't just undo my changes without reliable citations, otherwise I will complaint you. Dl ff ( talk) 11:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
why you're just again and again undoing all changes,100 t-55 tanks which are received by pak from serb. are mentioned in given source,but there is no mention of 336 active t-55 tanks even pakistan never ever operated more than 50 t-55 tanks after 2010(I have two source's where it's mentioned'pakistan retired t-55 tanks,but I am still waiting for more reliable sources ),if you have any source with the mention of 236,active T-55(236 Old + 100 received = 336),than cite it,if you don't have any reliable citation than don't undo changes. Dl ff ( talk) 12:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Dear an asphalt, It is true that I have made many edits on pages related to Pakistan, but there is no edit that I have done without citation, nor I have attacked pages related to Pakistan. I've always said that if you have more reliable and updated sources you can undo all the changes I've made, I've never had a problem with that. Dl ff ( talk) 07:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello An Asphalt! Your additions to
CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 18:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Toddy1. I noticed that you changed the numbers and labels in the infobox of the an article on the
Pakistan Navy, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. When you make these kinds of edits you need to
include citations to reliable sources. Have a look at
referencing for beginners.
The infobox is meant to be a quick summary of the article (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes). So it would help if you added information to the relevant sections of the body of the article at about the same time as you changed the infobox. But please remember that even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it (see Wikipedia:Verifiability).
If you want to discuss your proposed edits, please do so at Talk:Pakistan Navy. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, You are spreading misinformation and propaganda. The sources you mentioned do not conform the claims you made. if you continue to vandalise without providing reliable sources for claims you made, You will be reported Johnsmit2340987 ( talk) 20:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Capitals00 ( talk) 09:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Capitals00 (
talk)
09:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The above alert is invalid because you didn't receive proper first alert about CTOP before, which I give you now below. -- Stylez995 ( talk) 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Stylez995 ( talk) 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I've reverted your removal of sourced content from the Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle article. While you did expand on your reasoning via the talk page, unfortunately the sources do not support the claim you're making -- there is a significant difference between a warhead being *deployed*, which is what the article claims; and a nation developing and testing one. As the article is explicitly referring to nations that have *deployed* a MIRV, not just tested one, I've reverted your change as it involved blanking of reliably sourced content. If you can provide a reliable source that shows Pakistan has actually deployed a MIRV operationally, we could include that then. Additionally, please note that demanding other editors not revert your content is against our policies -- you do not own the article and must assume good faith in other editors behavior, particularly if they are utilizing the bold, revert, discuss process. Thank you for your consideration. ⇒ SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 23:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
ICUBE is a payload just like other payloads on change-6, and also its not what I think even sources say that cnsa is operating it.If its a Pakistani mission it should be operated by Pakistan.Its just a payload made by suparco not a separate mission by it.So,please counter fact rather than warning me.If you want than discuss it on article's talk page.Thanks. User:Edasf (talk).
@ User:Edasf First of all, it doesn't matter if it is "payload". The fact of the matter is, it's a Pakistani payload. Look at South Korea's Danuri probe; it was a "payload" on Falcon 9 just like ICUBE-Q; and it's considered a separate mission. Second, are you trying to imply that a Pakistani probe is operated by CNSA by adding a random and questionable source? CNSA only operated it initially till the deployment just like any other international payload would be. After deployment, the control is transferred to the respective space agencies.. User:An Asphalt (talk)
@ User: An Asphalt Provide a source which say it that SUPARCO really operates as its pure speculation.And actually Danuri was just launched using falcon 9 and South Korea operated it which isn't with ICUBE and please before reverting discuss it on talk page.I dont think I have done any vandalism so please remove my name from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism User:Edasf (talk)
@ User:Edasf There is no rule or law that says that your launch should be a sole payload to be considered as your mission. You are just making up stuff at this point. Payload or independent launch, it doesn't change the fact that it's a Pakistani payload. Also here is a source that is not one off like you are providing as multiple sites have reported it. It says "IST will conduct tests". Now obviously IST is a research university and cannot directly contro the satellite. It is obvious that those tests would be done through the national space agency i.e SUPARCO. Like I said CNSA had a minimal role, that too till the deployment.
User:An Asphalt (talk)
@ User:Edasf I removed your name from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism long ago since the second point you raised was genuine but I hope I have addressed it.