Hello, Alphaparrot! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
Peaceray (
talk)
04:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi, Alphaparrot. I reverted your changes while retaining the requested move banner. While
WP:BOLD is one of Wikipedia's principles, so is
WP:CONSENSUS. This is where
Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle comes into play. The type of changes that you made must be made after a discussion, particularly when there is more than two candidate names for the article. Please see my comments at
Talk:Fulton gap#Requested move 24 June 2020.
The reason that I reverted your edit was that you inter-weaved into the article a name that gets just as many mentions as the Fulton Gap at scholar.google.com, & there was no way of reasonable way of balancing the article between Fulton Gap & Photovaporation valley without major editing.
Frankly, I do not think that either Fulton Gap or Photoevaporation valley should be the name of the article. There are so many more mentions of the Radius gap at
Google scholar that it seems obvious to me. I believe that the major editing should go towards Radius gap, with Fulton Gap or Photoevaporation valley as alternate names & redirects.