![]() | AlphaBetaGamma is currently feeling
discouraged about Wikipedia and is taking an off-and-on
wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. |
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Please familiarize yourself with MOS:LEAD before commenting on other users talk page.
"As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate, although it is common for citations to appear in the body and not the lead."
In other words, if the body contains sourced information, a source in the lede is optional.
Hey! I'm a person who is aspiring to be a newseditor so any tips as it is my first time editing wikipedia? -- Thechiceditor12 ( talk) 13:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to publish a article -- Garima badiwal ( talk) 19:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
What do I need to start editing? -- Abdushariff Muhumuza ( talk) 10:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Mentor, I'm an Astrophysicist here to post about the subject. What do you think of the fact (according my opinion), that at the Centers of the Galaxies are only Huge Stars, that their pull dictates, stabilizes and manipulates the existence of the Stars within their Galaxy and the theory of the Black Holes is an unacceptable and imbecile thought, because the black holes are (according their mentors) entities that pull only, entities that according my opinion does not exist, because all the facts works against the black holes and support the existence of the MAIN STARS within a Solar system and within a Galactic system. -- AstrophysicistThemis ( talk) 17:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi ABG, I found that you edited a page which seems completely outside of your expertise (Japan) namely the biography of a living scientist and founder of a notable non-profit research institution, the Carl Correns Foundation. You rejected the page, bc some of the sentences in the biography were inadequately sourced. That does not seem a valid reason, since these data can be added over time. It does not mean that the scientist in question should not have their page. Their is a lengthy discussion about the 8 criteria on the talk page, and how these criteria were actually met. Did someone vandalize your authorship? It looks as if this could have happened. There is some spiteful entities here whuch may have caused some trouble. In any case, please review the material, which contains much valuable resources and citations. PowerUser22 ( talk) 20:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)