![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
![]() |
Hi AleatoryPonderings! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
I made the following change [1], please verify those are correct. Coumans in particular should be fine, the original version was published in 2010, and was online afterwards (2011), but I don't know if the Janda changes are correct or if you had another source in mind. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 00:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AleatoryPonderings! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford ( talk) 07:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for reviewing a submission at Did you know!
In the review, you mentioned that you don't know how to check whether someone is exempt from the QPQ requirement.
People are not required to do a quid pro quo review for the first five submissions they make at DYK. You can see how many reviews someone has made by clicking "QPQ check" in the toolbox on the left side of the nomination. That will take you to this page. Just put in the nominator's username, and it will show you how many DYK credits they have. If they have 5 or more, they need a QPQ. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 21:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, AleatoryPonderings, and welcome to Women in Red. Although you've only been contributing for a couple of weeks, I see you have already created a variety of articles including four interesting biographies of women. As you are interested in law, you might find some women deserving coverage in our Wikidata list of redlinks on law or in the other topics covered by our redlists. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
For Annie Rothwell. Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 16:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of
R v Zora at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
21:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
08:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm enjoying your Supreme Court of Canada articles and wonder if you are aware of this project and would like to add your new articles to it? Best, Yoninah ( talk) 08:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
On 11 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article R v Zora, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in R v Zora, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the offence of breaching bail conditions requires subjective mens rea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/R v Zora. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, R v Zora), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi I’ve just reviewed Mary Caesar. Thanks for creating such a well-sourced article. Mccapra ( talk) 15:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of legal abbreviations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court of Exchequer ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Sarah Chapone at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
01:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
On 25 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olive Stott Gabriel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that suffragist Olive Stott Gabriel supported James Wolcott Wadsworth Jr.'s 1920 Senate campaign, although he opposed extending the vote to women? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olive Stott Gabriel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Olive Stott Gabriel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
On 25 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Civil investigative demand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many law enforcement authorities in the United States can issue civil investigative demands to compel the production of documents before an action has begun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Civil investigative demand. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Civil investigative demand), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
On 26 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Réjane Laberge-Colas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Réjane Laberge-Colas was the first woman to serve as a superior court judge in Canada? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Réjane Laberge-Colas. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Réjane Laberge-Colas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AleatoryPonderings
Thank you for creating Jael Pye.
User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Whiteguru ( talk) 01:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hiya I've made a review and some comments over at Template:Did you know nominations/Cecelia Goetz, looking forward to seeing what you think. Mujinga ( talk) 09:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
On 29 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annie Rothwell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a poem by Annie Rothwell was read to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Queen's University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Rothwell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Annie Rothwell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
On 30 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarah Chapone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th-century England to slavery in her legal treatise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah Chapone. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Sarah Chapone), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
On 30 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Hardships of the English Laws in Relation to Wives, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th-century England to slavery in her legal treatise? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, The Hardships of the English Laws in Relation to Wives), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AleatoryPonderings
Thank you for creating Holmes v. Walton.
User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work..
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gazal world ( talk) 18:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
On 31 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Nauns Ricks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that poet William Nauns Ricks wrote an ode to Charles Young, the first African-American colonel in the United States Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Nauns Ricks. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, William Nauns Ricks), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Guerillero | Parlez Moi 12:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
I'm glad to be able to withdraw the Almas (folklore) nomination. Your work convinced me. // Timothy :: talk 19:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC) |
On 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya, corporations may be liable in Canadian courts if their operations in other countries violate customary international law? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
On 5 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cecelia Goetz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in order to serve as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials, Cecelia Goetz had to receive a "waiver of disability" from Telford Taylor because she was a woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cecelia Goetz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Cecelia Goetz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee ( talk) 00:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Done
Seamen's Haven →
Seamen's haven (
closed by non-admin page mover)
Kadzi (
talk)
12:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proper Cup of Coffee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello again :). Hope you're doing well. I had a small request if you have time. There is a user Leesaaisath on my talk page that is discouraged and thinking about leaving. They received a few dings from users and I nominated an article for deletion. I tried to encourage them, if you have time I thought you might be able to offer a word of encouragement and advice also, in hopes of retaining a potentially good editor with under-represented language skills. Again hope you're doing well. // Timothy :: talk 14:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
My recent Draft was not verified, plz help the person i had mentioned is really a professional football coach i had given sufficient References plz help.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darzubair ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
If you've made sure all these criteria are met, your article should be ready for mainspace. Happy editing! AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 16:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For pinging me when needed. Bearian ( talk) 14:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC) |
@ Bearian: Very much appreciate it! Was about to give you a barnstar for taking on the boring work—please consider this your barnstar as well :) AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 14:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, AleatoryPonderings,
I was just working with a page you tagged and found that you were a longtime editor/admin who was returning to work on the project. So, I thought I'd welcome you back! I'm sure many things have changed while some of the old problems remain. I see few old-timers return after leaving years ago so thanks for doing so and connecting this account with your previous identity. Liz Read! Talk! 21:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
On 20 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Budlong Pickle Company, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a "pickle train" delivered workers to the Budlong Pickle Company in the early 20th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Budlong Pickle Company. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Budlong Pickle Company), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee ( talk) 00:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Photogenic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A. Shohag ( pingme|| Talk) 16:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Debra Satz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Market.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
May remove this PROD, haven't decided if I want to spend the time editing the article, but found at least AllMusic, CMJ, The Washington Post, and Billboard, thanks. Caro7200 ( talk) 18:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Tbh I don't think I ever actually listened to him? I was just interested in old music/entertainment at the time, I think. A very interesting figure, definitely! AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 15:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Just a formality. :-) --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa.
05:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I’ve added a detailed comment and some sources on the Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid discussion page. Following your comment - Id be happy if you read my comment and tell me what you think. Thanks! DEgnel ( talk) 18:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
email me so I can reply, with great appreciation. -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 19:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Odd Balls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oddball.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 30 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martha Moulsworth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 17th-century English writers Martha Moulsworth and Alice Sutcliffe are each known for a single literary work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martha Moulsworth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Martha Moulsworth), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
On 30 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alice Sutcliffe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 17th-century English writers Martha Moulsworth and Alice Sutcliffe are each known for a single literary work? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Alice Sutcliffe), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Nothing more important than editors constructively working together. Cheers colleague 🍾 Celestina007 21:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
For sorting out the mess that had become of the Dairy in India DYK! – SD0001 ( talk) 04:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Photogenic (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thank you for your contributions at the AfD and on the article. I appreciate the hard work you put into this. You did convince me, this is notable. I would have commented as such at the AfD, but it was closed. Best wishes, Waggie ( talk) 14:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, hope all is well. I'm curious about your redirection of Urban Research Program. I actually considered that, but ended up deciding to PROD, given that the URP isn't mentioned at the target article at all, and doesn't seem to merit a mention. What was your thinking? Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 00:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
On 5 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Graeber, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the long delay answering and missing the discussion. A redirect to Illuminati is neither wholly wrong nor wholly right. I really don't understand where the proper venue would be to discuss this as the pages I found were marked closed, so please bear with me for writing to you instead. I'll gladly repost if I can find the proper place. :-) Illuminism is still today pretty much a nonword in English, it got a minimum of traction only because the word for enlightenment in some big Romance languages is illuminisme - illuminismo, making it a tempting false friend for nonnative writers, like "today I didn't become my mail' (bekommen = receive in German). It even had a WP entry, which was clearly a forgotten stub for enlightenment when a very thorough entry for it already existed. After long notice I deleted the stub and put in the redirect. I still find no usage referring to illuminati, either the conspiracy theory or the original, actual group of people. Wikitionary has an unimpeacheable entry that references the French and lists all the related terms. To align WP to Wikitionary I'd prefer the redirect to enlightenment, but illuminism is so marginal, and the WP Illuminati entry so thorough, that it might not really matter. Spamhog ( talk) 16:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi AleatoryPonderings, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors ( User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe ( talk) 06:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Sierra Chart. I do not think that Sierra Chart fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because This is an article about a piece of software, not about a company. A7 does not apply.. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead, if this was an article, or another process such as MfD or XfD as appropriate. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 22:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
On 14 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dairy in India, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nearly half the milk produced in India, whose dairy industry is the largest in the world, comes from buffaloes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dairy in India. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dairy in India), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Noted—thanks for the clarification. Kyuko ( talk) 17:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi AleatoryPonderings,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 19:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
three if you post templates without help please notify the pages creator or help by adding text and information thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginrei ( talk • contribs)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosie Carpe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Nouvelle République.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
On 21 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Turner, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 19:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope all is well. I saw you prodded an article created by Charles Rapeneau looking at that users page creations, many seems suspect. I PRODDED one, thought you might be interested in taking a look at some, of the others if time allows. Of course, please don't feel obligated. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Great stuff all around- particularly at AFD! Keep up the good work. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC) |
@ Eddie891: Ah, that's so kind of you! I really appreciate it :) AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 23:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
You made an error in your edit in respect to Atherton's award of the post nominal FRSA. This relates to being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts and has nothing whatsoever do to with the Royal Society which you used as evidence for your edit. 83.216.75.225 ( talk) 22:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Some thoughts on drinking in Philadelphia. 1) I don't think Atlas Obscura is a reliable source,
their FAQ states Anyone, anywhere in the world can add to Atlas Obscura.
However, they do state all contributions to Atlas Obscura are reviewed by our editorial team.
. Still, not the best source, imo. 2) Might be a good idea for us to start using {{
in use}} to avoid edit conflicting. 3) How do you feel about converting the 'list of notable fountains' to table form? Best,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
13:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for helping make edits to Mohamed Gad-el-Hak. It's a weird case, he is definitely a professor with a long list of achievements, but still not super well known outside of his field. Also, the blatant COI and self-promo, while not unusual, seemed to be incorporated into his resume. It's like he was using his own self-written Wikipedia page as an accolade. Very odd! But thank you so much for helping clean it up. I'm going to take another crack at it this weekend if I have time. MrAureliusR Talk! 20:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
The article cites "Austin 1889" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Or is it a typo and should be "Scott 1899"? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) to highlight such errors in the future. Thanks, Renata ( talk) 04:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Better Than Working, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Hola! Wanted to wave-by and say hello! Hope all is well! Ktin ( talk) 15:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi AleatoryPonderings. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Nice work on D. Narcisa de Villar. Always a pleasure to see such well sourced articles in the new pages queue. Have you considered applying for New Page Reviewer permissions? From what I've seen, your content creation and AfD work is excellent, and we could always use more active reviewers :) – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 19:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thank you for reviewing a number of my articles! Juan de Bolas Talk 19:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC) |
how did you become so big so fast in wikipedia? how did you do all that? they have declined all my requests everywhere please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvin kipchumba kosgei ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
wow that is a very detailed explanation of me. okay i will start slow and stop misusing wikipedia thank — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvin kipchumba kosgei ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC) i love the art of never giving up could i ask you questions in the future about things that i do not know in wikipedia Alvin kipchumba kosgei ( talk) 07:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your support 154.154.88.131 ( talk) 17:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, i am mostly a wikipedian in swahili and i kind of saw that they did not have 'methali' in english proverbs could there be a way to open up a knew sister for wikipedia for showing language expressions not only for proverbs but also for various language expressions that will help a lot of people who are writing or reading essays, articles and even makes them understand it much more better. Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 13:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
ooh yeah! i`ve seen it in english but not in swahili, but dont you think that there should be a seperate side for language expressions Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 14:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
do you think the whole of wikipedia should be updated Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 14:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
okay, thanks a lot for your help Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 15:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
hey, if you still remember about the swahili wiktionary i have a problem in it there is no special user access granted such as extended confirmed users , administrators or even burueacats so that means that there is no maintanance in it because you cannot delete articles that are not relevant to swahili Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 13:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Do you think the competitions in wikipedia are true? Alvin kipchumba ( talk) 05:37, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Welcome back. Your old user page still says that the account's an admin. I'd forgot the Phantom Tollbooth character; time to re-read that excellent book. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 23:52, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. The third source is undoubtedly the most reliable but the other two are consistent with it. I rejected other sources that were largely repetitious but more or less consistent. The first source is a website that is a project from the Portuguese Association of Women in Science, so I believe that can also be regarded as reliable. Roundtheworld ( talk) 21:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Have added few verifiable sources to the shakti plastic industries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhananjayrv ( talk • contribs) 20:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
For nominating a draft for speedy deletion because it duplicates an article, which is neither a speedy deletion reason nor a reason to delete a draft.
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
In reference to your proposals for the deletions of the articles Suzanne Vega: Live in London 1986 and Suzanne Vega: Sessions at West 54th, I will say the following. I have been through a deletion process before, and merely "let it go" (with the outcome of the deletion process being that the article that I created and put a lot of hard work on got deleted), and this was regardless of the numerous violations of Wikipedia standards that the various critics of that article (and critics of me) made. I have kept a record of this in case I need it. Already, in this case, you have violated core Wikipedia tenets by not first conversing or offering help about the albums or making any suggestions whatsoever. You went straight to a deletion proposal. That is *not* how the process is supposed to start.
I had never heard of the WP:NALBUM protocol before, so I went ahead and consulted it. I can see how the two articles I created might fail at least some of the notability standards articulated therein, but a thorough review has not yet been done with respect to all those standards, and you certainly didn't get into specifics yourself before your *hasty* deletion proposal. I would also like to ask you why you singled out those articles (that I just created earlier today) for deletion, whereas multiple other of the "Live Albums" on that category in her discography would also probably fail those same WP:NALBUM standards seeing as there is no mention of any charting positions for any of them, nor are any reviews posted of them (2 of the standards articulated in the WP:NALBUM protocol), and those articles have been up there for *years*.
Please be helpful and be more specific (step up your game), or I will report you to several other admins and we shall see where that goes. QuakerIlK ( talk) 03:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
[h]as been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it. And no, I'm not going to hound you by proposing deletion again. I can assure, though, that if you don't add reliable sources to those articles that establish notability for each album in particular, someone else will probably nominate them for deletion for the same reasons I'm citing now. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
What you deleted as "entirely uninformative" was a sentence that I had included that was later edited by another user to remove relevant information for some reason and appeared to be out of context. This has been added back in its entirety. Liberalvedantin ( talk) 04:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Liberalvedantin
Imho the Revision of 15:13, October 9, 2020 by AleatoryPonderings ("→Criticisms: rm essay-like and thinly sourced content, consolidate") takes out several value-added points, and makes the article read like a press release on behalf of WFP. The criticisms deleted touch on serious issues that are worth raising. JCJC777 ( talk) 15:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your work in detecting and removing copyvios, and for asking for revision deletions. I have declined your request for revision deletion in relation to Canadian Cancer Society because the violation was relatively minor, was not one that the society would likely have objected to, had been in the article for ten years and I thought came under the "large-scale use" exception mentioned here. Don't let me put you off from asking for RDs in the future, because I am relatively new at this and may be wrong. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 07:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
— Newslinger talk 15:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ AleatoryPonderings: I was wonder if you plan to add an image to the book article, The Politics of Evangelical Identity? scope_creep Talk 00:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Deletion to Quality Award | |
For your contributions to bring Dairy in India (prior candidate for deletion at: WP:Articles for deletion/Dairy in India) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Roller26 ( talk) 11:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC) |
Following this the problem is like I described in Interplay of UPE , Sockpuppetry & Advanced User Rights, most Nigerian UPE editors are master minds & know how to mix their UPE with legit productive good work such as this Yemi Blaq scenario & it may take honest volunteers involved in WP:WikiProject Nigeria such as I, HandsomeBoy & Versace1608 to say “nahh this is blatant UPE” or to say “too bad the creator was a UPE but this actually doesn't appear to be UPE & is on a notable subject” I haven’t checked all the articles created by them, probably technical editors like DannyS712 might have, but I certainly haven’t, but if you have, & aren’t sure of something or might want to confirm anything you can definitely ask me. Thanks for taking on this daunting task of weeding out what you may consider thrash as it certainly is a difficult one. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
On 14 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Drinking fountains in Philadelphia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wilson Cary Swann organized the construction of several drinking fountains in Philadelphia, in part to stop people from drinking alcohol? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drinking fountains in Philadelphia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Drinking fountains in Philadelphia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
On 14 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilson Cary Swann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wilson Cary Swann organized the construction of several drinking fountains in Philadelphia, in part to stop people from drinking alcohol? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Wilson Cary Swann), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I did my first NPP today at Holy Synod of the Albanian Orthodox Church if you have any suggestions/corrections, please let me know. Just making sure I'm on the right track. Hope things are well. // Timothy :: talk 14:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello dear, hope you are doing well. I am currently working on creating a new article in my sandbox on Dr. Zlatko Tesanovic, and just wanted to take your opinion regarding copyrights before creating the article? Please notice that there's a section dedicated to quotes in the article, which may appear as a copyright violations! What do you think? Do you have any suggestions or recommendations? Thanks in advance for any help you are able to provide.-- TheEagle107 ( talk) 20:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I've started editing recently on Wikipedia, but, despite my effort to respect the criterias, I had my page Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page). Piero Atchugarry Gallery deleted a few days go.
I would like to know if it will be possible to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement.
And also, what are your advise to get the article approuved ? What I should change, delete or add ?
Thank you so much for any help you could give. All my best
Donà Anna (
talk)
11:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your advices and your explications : AleatoryPonderings. I'll try to follow more strictly the "encyclopedia" rule for the future. As so, this page could be a good exemple ? /info/en/?search=Galerie_Perrotin
Moreover, it would be possible for me to edit the article in the right way ? Should I automatically ask for an editor review ?
Thank you again for all your help ! Donà Anna ( talk) 18:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Indeed I can't submit my request in WP:REFUND. Here what is mentioned "Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here. Requests for the undeletion of pages deleted under criteria G11 these criteria will not be accepted here. Please check the deletion reason by going to the page before posting here. If you feel that an article deleted under any of these criteria was deleted in error, please contact the deleting administrator."
Can I recreate the article with the same title and in the proper way by myself ? Donà Anna ( talk) 20:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Donà Anna ( talk) 22:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christoph Hartmut Bluth, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoph Hartmut Bluth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Good Morning. Wanted to check one thing with you. This DYK thing still seems super elusive to me. I think I might have a shot with this one here Template:Did_you_know_nominations/J._Michael_Lane. But, then, I think I will fall short on the QPQ thingie. That one seems super complex. Have you encountered a dummy-fied tool or instructions to complete the QPQ? Also, if you see anything that can be edited in my submission, let me know, or definitely feel free to directly make those edits. Cheers. Ktin ( talk) 16:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
On 26 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lee Kun-hee, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 00:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
I rejected the G 12 for Alessandro Sette. I believe the source of the text is a federal government agency and therefore public domain. You think I misread it?-- S Philbrick (Talk) 01:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 14:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi I appreciate your message about COI in the di Prima page. I don't believe I have one. I'm not the one who added a reference to my interview and it doesn't matter to me if it remains there or not; I'm just trying to set the record straight. The fact is di Prima's page is woefully short of content for a major poet who was active for 50-plus years, and I'll definitely be contributing further (and encouraging others to do so) in the future. Dhadbawnik ( talk) 20:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
I am the person who conducted the interview with di Prima referenced above, so I was assuming that you had some sort of personal relationship with Diane di Prima. The edit of mine you reverted mentions a person whose name resembles your username, which appeared to indicate that you were in fact editing an article with which you have a personal connection. If that is not correct, or if your connection with di Prima was journalistic or otherwise arm's-length, all good, but I wanted to alert you of the potential problem in any event. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 20:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
I understand what you're saying and I take this very seriously. As I said, my initial intention was to correct deliberately false information that someone posted associated with my interview (yes, I did the interview way back when). All of my edits are factually correct and sourced, and obviously open to scrutiny. I will make no more edits on the page in view of your point about COI. Dhadbawnik ( talk) 21:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 10:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Hi AleatoryPonderings. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
On 5 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Betty Dodson, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
On 12 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cándido Camero, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 15:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi A question which is important
Is apropriate to create a hashtag memory article in wikipedia?(contian populars in social network/trends) Im working in another version of wiki
I asked this of you and ask of others too Cus i didnt get it in laws of wiki and Everyone has his/her option So i need to reach an agreement Thx bro Pls check it fast and if you know a source tell me about it Im await you guy Bigbang2024 ( talk) 03:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)