|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
Self-trout
You have been self trouted for: not knowing about the email a Wikipedian page.
Alachuckthebuck (
talk)
05:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Alachuckthebuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 08:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Alachuckthebuck. Whose sock are you, please? Is your main account blocked? Bishonen | tålk 23:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC).
I am not a sock Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 01:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my main. What makes you think I’m a sock? My ip? Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 01:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Forgot the stinking capital letters lol. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 16:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
And um can you have someone oversight the edit thank asked for my block and get me unblocked? Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 16:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
would check user checking my logs for any links to accounts suffice to you as evidence that this a users primary account or would a sockpuppet investigation be the better idea? ps: do you know why they removed my statement? Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 16:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
00:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Alachuckthebuck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sock, this is my main account.
Decline reason:
Below this, you immediately declare you have edited before. Please appeal from your original account. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 01:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)}
Yes I have (UPDATE: this was a mistake that I tried to fix but got reverted, so trying to clear it up, and that is not true, I misunderstood the question). Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 16:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Um I meant I edited before on this account and before I ever made this account I read the policy pages and a large amount of arb com cases (including both the lightbreather case and brownhairedgirl.) I can see your points though. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 20:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
@ ToBeFree: I will if all other options fail out myself to arb com. I will willingly do a sockpuppet investigation or have a checkuser look at my IP logins. Will any of those options work to your satisfaction and/or be available in this case? Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 17:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
As you have said, I have read large amounts of arb com cases. Why do you think I want attention? And to give you the reason I made that first edit was to ask about adoption (ask him if you want to) and not seem like an idiot by talking about it on his talk page. And I’m just saying it can’t hurt to check as checkuser is mainly used in sockpuppet investigations. @ ToBeFree: I gave my consent (as if it matters anymore) and I regularly check the arb com cases list and that’s how I found it and thought it would be a good idea to add my 2 cents to that case. One last thing, can you give me one single piece of concrete evidence that I am not telling the truth? Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 23:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Since he's been emailing me, I replied the following to Alachuckthebuck
I understand why our community members are concerned. You've acted in a manner that implies you have a lot of knowledge of Wikipedia behind the scenes - knowledge that generally comes from years of experience. I've looked at your edits and I have to agree, I would assume you've previously had an account. Given that you have edited "project pages", and appear to have significant knowledge of Wikipedia, it appears that you are breaching our policy on "illegitimate uses of alternate accounts".
Can you please explain, on wiki (or to me by email if the reasons are private) - how you have so much knowledge of the inner workings of wikipedia, including history of individuals. I don't accept "I have read many Arbcom cases" without further explanation - why exactly? There's far more salacious areas to investigate, even on Wikipedia. The vast majority of Arbcom cases are dull, due to the diversity. Different people find different ones interesting, depending on where their area of interest lies. WormTT( talk) 10:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Worm That Turned: I have sent you an email with the whole picture. Please let me know any questions you may have. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 03:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your email, but I prefer to communicate on-wiki when possible. I'm not really the best person to ask about proving whether or not you have any alternate accounts, as I don't get involved in that area. I declined your unblock request because you appeared to assert that you did have multiple accounts. I have to endorse WTT's views above, that the administrative side of things is dull. The fun stuff is writing content. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Thank you for reading it, and I apologize for confusing you about that, it's very frustrating to not be able to edit and do the fun stuff so I have to the not-fun stuff first sadly. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 21:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Smash!
You've been
squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
You have been whaled for: Getting your self banned for making a statement to arbcom great job Chuck, great job. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 01:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
put the code in the userbox on the right.
please let me know if that isn't allowed. thank you. Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 00:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Ps: sorry about this whole mess but I want to improve Wikipedia and definitely made some mistakes but I stand by what I said aside from my first response witch was a mistake on my part Alachuckthebuck ( talk) 16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Georgegod245 ( talk) 19:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)sad