![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia lists and categories are limited to the Wikipedia articles. If you think I've made a mistake or need any edits for any particular article, please leave a message on my talk page. Brûkî27 ( talk) 22:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- LouisAragon ( talk) 20:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 17:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
19:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Aintabli ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Although I believe that it will add to me more than take, I am quite confused by this. Two weeks ago, I had already spent a great deal of time editing pages like Kurds in Lebanon, because they were drowned with content not supported with any sources by accounts banned by sockpuppetry ( [1]). And Brûkî27's interests and edits were largely similar, almost always involving unsourced material, removal of sourced material, reverts, or sources that didn't support the edit. I previously notified him/her of the disruptive edits, though didn't directly give a warning, and this user was already banned for a few hours after the 4 warnings by other users. I finally used my brain to file a sock puppet investigation 5 days ago. However, Brûkî27 didn't stop after the ban and continued with similar edits, and I couldn't get a reply for the investigation (for understandable reasons). This whole process wasn't influenced by any goal to use Wikipedia as an ideological battleground, because all of my reverts of Brûkî27's edits were based on whether the source supported the claim or not. Though, unlike some of the suspected sockpuppets, Brûkî27 didn't directly start an edit war until now. I was quite surprised to find that he/she started a frenzy of removing sourced information and reverting my edits, which was the exact behavior of the suspected sockpuppets. Persuaded through "the duck test," my first instinct was to revert and then report for vandalism along with edit summaries which, as I suspect, caused my ban. Before this, I always tried to be nice in my comments by thanking people that I had disagreements with in talk pages, but I was immensely amateur in controlling the situation and inadequate for Wikipedia's standards. I am ashamed of my self-entitled style in one of my edit descriptions, saying "or you will be banned," as if I have the authority. In either case of my ban, I am okay. Thank you for seeing Brûkî27's case. Ayıntaplı ( talk) 21:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
To be fair, the username similarity combined with the focus on Kurds/Kurdistan is so clear that I can already accept this unblock request. Reverting edits made by a sockpuppet is fine ( WP:BE), so there's nothing to complain about. When I placed the block, the situation looked more like a battlefield, spread across many pages with edit warring over the origins of people, which would be pretty disruptive from both editors if both editors' edits were legitimate. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Mostly against sockpuppets Shadow4dark ( talk) 19:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC) |
It would be good if you could restore the Columbia source, because that shouldn't have just been deleted, and then perhaps you can join me in the discussion that I've opened on the talk page for Syria to discuss this topic. "Levantines" seems like a problematic term, so it would be good to hear what you think it means. Iskandar323 ( talk) 08:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey there! I’ve seen you’ve undone my edit on Ingush people page. I would like to know why. Most information on Ingush people needs revision because it’s not neutral but biased, there are also a lot of grammar mistakes as well. Franklin Benjamin 123 ( talk) 17:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ayıntaplı. The
article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Evergreen • Gender studies Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
![]() An early view of the
convent in
Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Heather Dubrow • Evergreen Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
![]()
Sexuality in Islam: An icon depicting the treaty signing between
Muhammad and
Saint Catherine's Monastery allowing interfaith marriage between Muslims and Christians, as discussed in the
Ashtiname of Muhammad.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Convent • Heather Dubrow Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
An article you recently created,
Barak Turkmens, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
12:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ayıntaplı. The
article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Islamic sexual jurisprudence • Convent Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Selam sizin Azerice ve Turkce dil bilginiz ne kadar bilmiyorum ama mumkunse Azerice olan makaleyede bir göz atip ekleme yapsaniz harika olurdu. Özelikle dilin tarihi hakkinda cok kisa bir metin var ve yetersiz bir bilgiye sahip. Esenlikle kalin. 188.227.214.200 ( talk) 09:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Haber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A2. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Azerbaijanis, you may be
blocked from editing.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Origin of the Azerbaijanis, you may be
blocked from editing.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Iranian Azerbaijanis, you may be
blocked from editing.
We are all surprised by the blatant Pan-Turkish and Pan-Turanism that certain Turkish (not even Azeri) members of Wikipedia are peddling herewhen there are only 2 Turkish editors that opposed your edit is very clearly a reference to Ayıntaplı and Beshogur and is a personal attack ( ASPERSIONS). And now going even further and accusing random users of working "in group" is another clear instance of aspersions. I advise you to become familiar with NPA and use a better tone when speaking with editors who don't agree with your edits. — Golden call me maybe? 23:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Ayıntaplı Assalam alaikum! How are you? Товболатов ( talk) 11:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Good. Not so long ago, I wrote two articles there, for some reason the admins deleted one. I don’t know Turkish, maybe there were not big mistakes that could be corrected, look when there is time. True, I do not have a deleted article. If you ask the admins, they will send you to your personal account. Sorry for this request. I just thought you had a lot of experience with the Turkish Wikipedia project.-- Товболатов ( talk) 15:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
İçkerin Savaşı left this one. Ayıntaplı. and this one was removed Dargin zammı wrote it twice with difficulty))-- Товболатов ( talk) 15:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Battle of Dargo (1845) maybe it's better to write it again if there was a good translation, I would try to upload it myself.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Ayıntaplı He is of Chechen origin. Muhajirs live in Turkey and Syria, immigrants from the Caucasian war. Mahmud Şevket Paşa.-- Товболатов ( talk) 18:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Is the American and English Wikipedia one project or is there a separate American Wikipedia? Товболатов ( talk) 18:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuray Hafiftaş, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen and Native.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry to see how poorly you were treated during the whole Arakelova thing. Don't let it affect you, and I hope you continue to make outstanding contributions. Best wishes! — Golden call me maybe? 17:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vardan Aygektsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Mihran Toumajan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
11:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Possible sock but not sure wich master /info/en/?search=User:D%C3%AArsim%C3%AE62 Shadow4dark ( talk) 16:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this message is to address a series of unconstructive edits on middle eastern related pages. You've gone from page to page undoing and removing information from pages without any explanation or source.
If you wish to make such repeated changes bring it to the talk of the relevant pages for a constructive discussion instead of removing information that could be valuable to readers for no reason. For further information: contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you
Academic10 ( talk) 12:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Academic10 I believe reading WP:BRD, WP:CITENEED, WP:ES would be helpful for you. As far as WP:BRD is concerned, it's not me who should be taking this to the talk page, as you are trying to “add” (unsourced) content to various pages and edit-warring: WP:EW. Also, I have provided an edit summary for my edits, while there aren't any for much of your edits. Ayıntaplı ( talk) 20:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Selamlar sizi rahatsiz ediğim için özür dilerim sizinle özel olarak konusa bileceğimiz bir istegram yada telegram adresiniz var mi ? 131.117.142.140 ( talk) 12:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I trust you are doing well. Recently I have been patrolling your pages but I had translate the sources after I noticed that you are using the same sources over and over again. I searched for the name of the villages in the articles and I found nothing. I’m leaning towards mass deletion but I’ll be waiting for your reply. Please {{ ping}} me when you reply. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 05:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Ayıntaplı, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe ( talk) 05:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karaburun, Oğuzeli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
– dlthewave ☎ 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ayıntaplı. I wanted to talk to you about RMs. When you create one, you are given the ability to write up your proposal for why there should be a move. This text is treated both as a comment and as the formal proposal. Because of this, it is not advised to rewrite the proposal based on what others say. For one reason, it would make it confusing to a closer who might not understand the proposal was updated and would be at risk of being confused as to why users did not focus on what you had written. I apologize if I am not explaining this that well. -- Super Goku V ( talk) 03:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Ayıntaplı!
During your move request for the article about the earthquake(s) in Turkey and Syria, you made this edit half-way through the discussion, thereby changing your move request. I am sure this was done in good faith, and I understand that you may have done so to respond to the arguments that had been made in the votes and comments. However, changing your request half-way through, especially without leaving a trace of the original, is bad practice. It makes it hard to interpret the votes (when people say they support/oppose, do they support/oppose the original request, or the new one?). A possible (unintended) result of such a change is that people will change their vote to oppose regardless of their opinion on the matter.
I would suggest that you make one more change, this time such that all your edits are reflected (restoring the original request, leaving the new one, and why you changed it twice). You can strike through everything you said that's outdated, by placing it between <s> and </s>. Renerpho ( talk) 03:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have been creating articles about villages in Turkey, thanks for that! I would advise you not to use nufusune.com as the population reference (see also this comment on my talk page), but this more reliable one from the Turkish statistics office: "Address-based population registration system (ADNKS) results dated 31 December 2021" (XLS) (in Turkish). TÜİK.. Markussep Talk 08:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
References
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Zayn al-Din Qaraja you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Mike Christie --
Mike Christie (
talk)
15:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The article
Zayn al-Din Qaraja you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Zayn al-Din Qaraja for comments about the article, and
Talk:Zayn al-Din Qaraja/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Mike Christie --
Mike Christie (
talk)
20:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello again @ Aintabli. Thanks for your edits to Agriculture in Turkey. I see you are active on Turkish Wikipedia so I wonder if you might be interested in getting tr:Türkiye'de tarım up to good standard whilst I work on the English article. I think this would be synergistic as you could much more easily find Turkish sources than I can, so I could reuse them whilst you could reuse what I have already written in English. Interested? Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Aintabli and asalam o alikum, you've put the tag on Cemal Polat's page and I think this is not a fair move sir, The page has significiant coverage and passing the WP:GNG clearly. The person has also helped the people of Turkiye in the recent earth quake with ten of thousands pounds. When I see the news in TV, I decided to write a page on him. He has been mentioned as the best selling author in various news websites, newspapers, and magazine. His restaurant received the award from the UK's top publication. I will be thankful if you could re check the references and help in removing the tag or simply make it better but not delete it. I am on Wikipedia since more than a year and I know the notability criteria. I could make a mistake but on Cemal's page I am satisfied that the references are passing the notability.
IntelisMust (
talk)
09:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tall Hajar, Jarabulus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Dl.thinker ( talk) 03:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Dear Aintabli, thank you for your quick reaction in Talk:Antoine Hamilton. It seems the topic is not limited to that article. I would have thought that images in biographical infoboxes would serve about the same purpose as ID-photos and should look like them. I have the impression there is no guidance pertaining to portraits in MOS:LEADIMAGE and the Biography Project does not seem to have its own guideline. Zooming in on portraits that show more than the head sometimes produces useful ID-photos and sometimes fails to do so. In my experience the failures usually are caused by a bad quality of the original portrait. In my opinion, an example of a successful zoom-in of that sort is Hugo Krabbe. Antoine Hamilton is certainly less successful. Perhaps I should zoom out a bit more. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade ( talk) 18:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
visual confirmation that we've arrived at the right page. In the case of Hamilton, we cannot see the full shape of his hair, which in my opinion is relevant to this quote. Thank you, Aintabli ( talk) 20:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
On 26 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zayn al-Din Qaraja, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zayn al-Din Qaraja was imprisoned and executed by the Mamluk Sultanate after he declared the independence of the Beylik of Dulkadir? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zayn al-Din Qaraja. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Zayn al-Din Qaraja), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, because you recently participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Turkic dynasties and countries, which also led to the deletion of Comparison of the Turkic states, I would like to invite you to participate in the partial follow-up Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of the Baltic states. The situation of these three pages is not exactly the same (because language family plays no role in these cases), but because many issues are similar, I've nominated them as well, and am curious what you think. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 08:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Aintabli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Mihran Toumajan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 12:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello.
Can you find any information about the status of the Gaziantep Mevlevi Culture and Foundation Works Museums and Gaziantep Museum of Archaeology? They are closed since the earthquake, but have they sustained damage in the earthquake?
I have seen recent photos of Gaziantep, and the damage it suffered is indeed awful. Somehow, after the clearing of the debris, the city looks worse, before it is going to be better, unless they build new buildings shoddily again and another powerful earthquake destroys them again.
Yours sincerely, 31.200.20.235 ( talk) 16:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[2] Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Mr Aintabli, I understand you are at the origin of the removal of the "list of kakapo" page. While I may understand the concerns you had about this page, it has definitely notability value for the community for numerous reasons: - Kakapo recovery program is the most notable, most well-funded and most successful bird recovery program in New Zealand, birds were saved from the absolute brink of extinction. They were given names and so did their offspring, the fact those individual names are so important is because of their limited genepool and the fact that certain birds have to breed in order for the species to survive as a whole (most notably, the offspring of the Fiordland kakapo Richard Henry) - therefor, this information is key. - The article is well-sourced - the Twitter, Instagram and Facebook sources come directly from the New Zealand Department of COnservation that lead the program and are as such not a matter of controversy - The article is completely up to date with the control of those official sources - The article is important for the non-scientific community, as there is no other publicly available source of information for this list of birds - Due to the strong emotional bond many people within or outside New Zealnd (such as me) feel to these birds, it is important to have the names, especially since the information is correct - One would argue that when a list with no interest whatsoever such as like the succession order to the throne of a country exists, this list would be way more important. - To gauge the interest, I would suggest you take a look at takapodigs (Andrew Digby) - the science advisor for the kakapo recovery program page on Twitter, and on the Department of Conservation and Kakapo Recovery and Sirocco the Kakapo pages on Facebook and Instagram to see how thousands of people are literally rabid about the informations you deem uncrucial.
As such, I would ask you to return the page to wikipedia, or at the very least provide me the PDF of the last version of the page, so that at the very least I can follow it on my side and at least keep the info and share it with the (numerous) people interested in it.
Thanks for the read, I hope you take the appropriate measures in either restoring the page or merging it with the kakapo page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PasquiDerder ( talk • contribs) 07:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taşçanak, Oğuzeli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vartan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Aintabli. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 12:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Aintabli, May I ask you why my edits, which I don't think were too intrusive, were all reset? Best regards. Sirgûcî ( talk) 14:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
@ Aintabli:, Since you withdrew the nomination, can you please close the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serhat Gülpınar? (see Wikipedia:Closing discussions if you need help). Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk) 16:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for moving it. I was planning to do it soon, but you beat me to it :) — Golden call me maybe? 18:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Aintabli,
Please finish your closure of this AFD discussion. You need to untag the article under discussion and put the appropriate AFD closure tag on the article talk page. The closing instructions were linked in the AFD discussion if you need some help. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for taking on the review of this article, I look forward to working with you to bring it up to GA status! Just a friendly note, I noticed you placed the review on hold, however the review itself has not been completed against all criteria. Per WP:GAN/I#HOLD the "on hold" status is for articles where you as the reviewer have completed the review and there are additional notes to finalise the article that need completed by me as the nominator. You shouldn't be changing the status of the review until you have completed every aspect of the review. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 08:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)