Hello, Afghan.Records, and welcome to Wikipedia!
An edit that you recently made to Khalji dynasty seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.
Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Re Packer&Tracker ( talk) 02:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Khalji dynasty—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
01:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Starship 24 ( talk) 22:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Khalji dynasty.
पाटलिपुत्र
(Pataliputra)
(talk)
20:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Since you are currently at 7RR, maybe you should consider using the article talk page? -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
22:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Your recent edits, to the Khalji article appear to have been copy and pasted verbatim from the source(s). You need to paraphrase the information to avoid plagiarism.
Directly copied from the book. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 14:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Afghan.Records! Your additions to
Khalji dynasty have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Consider this your first and last warning for commenting on the ethnicity(believed or otherwise) of other editors.
Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear. Every user is expected to interact with others civilly, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 23:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Pashtuns. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges.
Please do not delete sourced information or use false edit summaries -
Arjayay (
talk)
08:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Pashtuns. 'Do not removed sourced content'
Fancy vißes (
call)
00:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that in
this edit to
Ghilji, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pashtuns, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 00:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
01:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bactria. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 12:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Bactria.
Thatoneguylol101 (
talk)
21:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Kanguole
16:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
17:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Dennis Brown -
2¢
03:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)This is a community block, as per [1], so any appeal to this block must be done at WP:ANI, and not to an individual administrator. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 03:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.to the bottom of your talk page. Address the concerns raised by filling in "your reason here". Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 01:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
source misrepresentation, pov pushing and using poor sources ... history of not responding to their own talk page messages ... lack of civility when interacting with other editors ... restored his edits, ignored other editors' concerns, and started edit warring again. Please read through Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, I suggest this route: You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators: that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead. WP:POV, WP:EW, WP:CIVIL. starship .paint ( RUN) 02:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.