|
Hi, you added the Kappa Sigma motto to Kappa Sigma, but did not provide a source. Please see the discussion at Talk:Kappa Sigma#AEKDB and referencability. NYCRuss ☎ 12:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I am personally concerned about your username, given your non-membership in Kappa Sigma and your interest in publication of information which, as far as I can tell, a Kappa Sigma brother would consider to be inappropriate to post in public. I am a member of a Greek Letter Organization, and would feel uncomfortable if an equivalent username was created for my Greek Letter Organization. I thought I would drop you a note with my thoughts. Note that the Wikipedia Policy on Usernames can be found at WP:BADNAME
In regards to posting of the meanings of AEKDB/ΑΕΚΔΒ, as a member of a Greek Letter Organization, I am uncomfortable with it being posted, but in this case, the lack of a reference is the governing principle. I have been told that this information is not even in the ritual books, so a reference even from Wikileaks will be Problematic. Naraht ( talk) 15:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk about not being courteous! Naraht is at Wikipedia:Help desk, and NYCRuss is at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention, but neither of them had the courtesy to inform me of these discussions. I welcome it though, and I hope this will draw additional attention to the serious conflict of interest editing taking place on fraternity articles. KappaSigmaAEKDB ( talk) 17:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
You may have disclosed your affiliation with Kappa Sigma, Enos, but you have not come remotely close to abiding by WP:COI where your editing/edit-warring is concerned:
You need to not only acknowledge your COI, but act in accordance with it. The fact is that your fraternity, like the Masons, does not allow atheists to become members. Let editors who aren't Kappa Sigma members determine how to handle that information in the article. Adelphoi En Kardia Dia Biou ( talk) 08:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
As a Kappa Sigma Brother, it disgusts me that you think you have the right (AS A NON-BROTHER) to divulge privileged information about Kappa Sigma. As a 3rd Degree Master Mason, it disgusts me that you obviously did not pay attention during your initiation. Ritual is kept secret for a reason, nobody except true and lawful brothers have the right to know about it. You do not understand the meaning of a a brotherhood or a fraternity. It is not your place to inquire why some things are kept secret and others are not, because you are not a Kappa Sigma and never will be one. Thus, the fact that you divulge these secrets is immoral and wrong. People like you truly make me sad and angry. -- KappaSigma989 ( talk) 18:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Please note: you've been reported for your disruptive edits and edit warring here. jheiv ( talk) 21:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
You were asked to seek consensus before editing the article, please do not edit the article again with the same contentious edits. jheiv ( talk) 19:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Again, because of your continued refusal to seek consensus and insert contentious material and your insistence on being disruptive, you have been reported. jheiv ( talk)
You've said that I know more about wikipedia policies than you, which seems to be the case.
But anyway, here are some suggestions if you really think what you have written:
I am confident my actions will be vindicated, but I'm not immune to reasoned criticism. jheiv ( talk) 21:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
May I suggest that working on a wider variety of articles in addition to the ones that you have worked on so far, and thus making concerns about being a Single Purpose Account, might work better for everyone. Naraht ( talk) 13:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AEKDB. Since you had some involvement with the AEKDB redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). jheiv talk contribs 07:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure expressing an opinion on four Redirects for Discussion makes you no longer an SPA, but it is a start. 1/2 :)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kappa Sigma. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. -
FASTILY
(TALK)
21:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Adelphoi En Kardia Dia Biou. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Adelphoi En Kardia Dia Biou~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:KappaSigmaCrest-AEKDB.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:08, 11 August 2016 (UTC)