No, I don't think so. I did leave a note saying "This table includes countries with over 100 cases ONLY, do not re-add countries with less than 100 cases" on the "2009 flu pandemic by country table section" edit page. Before I had made the edit, below the table, it says "Includes countries with over 100 confirmed cases only" You should probably have noticed it before you made the edit. Have a nice day.
Appreciate very much your contributions to the pandemic table, but I notice you've lately started posting unreferenced and unsubstantiated nunbers. Do you not have references for these?
I see that you changed the 9/11 Ecuador number of 1,650 confirmed back to last week's 1,001. I've set it back, buit was curious as to why you did so. Do oyu not consider Xinhua a credible source? That organization is referenced multiple times in the table... Sqlman ( talk) 17:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Additionally to what I have explained on the talk page, I wondered, why you have removed referenced numbers (weekly estimates for UK and Spain) without any explanation?
FHessel (
talk)
07:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I like your additions talking about Aust. and N.Z. and how 3rd world countries probably aren't going to be able to afford this expensive stuff, which might be very needed.
Key information, well worth discussing.
I should warn you. I am a radical! With lives at stake, I think it's well-worth relaxing the "rules" of wikipedia. (I am a radical who cites the New Eng Journal of Medicine, makes it much more interesting that way.)
Keep trying. And keep in there swinging. Cool Nerd ( talk) 01:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:2009 flu pandemic table with cases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Magioladitis (
talk)
14:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)