Hello, Abrasax123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Oromo Expansions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa ( talk) 20:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Oromo people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
14:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Oromo people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies ( talk) 23:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, the source from Richard pranukst book say and I quote; “for the most part the Oromo lived south of present day Ethiopia”. That is northern Kenya. He mentioned no word of southern Ethiopia. 2A00:A041:3D5E:CB00:AC7C:91D:C7B0:742D ( talk) 00:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
It looks like you're in the midst of an edit war at Boorana and possibly other articles. Remember that WP:3RR is a bright-line rule that you can be blocked for violating, unless you meet a limited number of exceptions. — C.Fred ( talk) 04:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LucasKannou ( talk) 04:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Abrasax123 reported by User:LucasKannou (Result: ). Thank you.
LucasKannou (
talk)
04:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User:Ymblanter (
talk)
07:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Hi, I was asked to look into an edit conflict concerning this article. What is the major differences between the two versions of this article? I've looked at both versions, & beyond the fact one has 6 citations & the other 5, I don't see any differences. I find this dispute odd, but there have been more bitter fights over more trivial matters. -- llywrch ( talk) 17:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Socialwave597 ( talk) 11:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
08:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Socialwave597. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Balcha Safo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Socialwave597 (
talk)
02:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gyrofrog (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Is there any reason why you keep reverting my edits without adequate reason? Your rationale appears lacking. There are numerous pages employing a similar format. Collages in articles save space and show lots of different things in a small area, making the reading experience better. Moreover, the earlier version of the page neglected to feature several crucial figures from this ethnic group, a mistake now remedied in the updated content. Furthermore, I've included additional images and made improvements to the page. Please refrain from reverting these changes. JUMPp1harm ( talk) 00:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some
guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the
test Wikipedia. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be
blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
Fantastic Mr. Fox (
talk)
12:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)