Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without an account, your IP address (82.28.140.226) is used to identify you instead.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. We also have an
intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to
sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing!
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 23:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Your questions on the ref desk woud be better received if you gave any indication that you had read the proffered answers and the references cited therein. In particular, did you look up the literature cited by User:DuncanHill and myself to your Black Murderers question before starting the new section on Black Violence ? And what's next Black Intelligence or Black Sexuality ? I wish to assume good faith but your editing is increasingly resembling trolling, and if you continue in this vein you are likely to be blocked from editing wikipedia. Abecedare ( talk) 18:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Maybe I could have re-worded it better for you. And I think implying that I am trolling plus the thinly veiled threats are totally uncalled for. You are reading the wrong narrative in my questions. This is called bias. I look forward to your urgent apology.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
20:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for playing troll-the-admins, you have unlocked the 48 hour block achievement. Guy ( Help!) 23:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
82.28.140.226 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have made no racist comments. I stand by this. An audit trail of my activity is public for all to see. As such, the blocking policy is incorrect and the block should be reversed. I also object to the patronising message that was also left on my TP. I feel this was wholly inappropriate, puerile behaviour and damages the integrity of the project.
Decline reason:
Obvious troll is obvious. Max Semenik ( talk) 06:16, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 15:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Monty
845
15:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)You've been warned and hatted bfore by other users such as AndyTheGrump for your escapades at the ref desks, your talk page makes this clear. Now you insist on restoring a hatted request for prediction against the guidelines at the top of the page. If you continue this, you will be reported to ANI for indefinite blocking without further warning. μηδείς ( talk) 21:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
MusikAnimal
talk
21:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |