Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Kirstie Allsopp, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Kevin Forsyth (
talk)
17:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Owned. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Jimmy Pitt (
talk)
09:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John of England, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Hello, I'm
Igoldste. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Jim Morrison— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Ira Goldstein (
talk)
05:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
MC Ride. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be undone.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — T O G 05:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
MC Ride, you may be
blocked from editing. —
T
O
G
05:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
MC Ride. —
T
O
G
19:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi 80.5.88.70. Editors are allowed to remove comments from their user talk pages except in certain specific cases as explained in WP:REMOVED; moreover, editors are not obligated to respond to anything posted on their user talk pages. Since Graemp decided to remove your post, the community assumes in good faith that he read it, understood it, and decided not to respond it. If your concern is related to an edit at a specific article, then perhaps it would be best to address them on the talk page for the article in question. If it's related to a specific genre of articles, try asking for assistance on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject or public noticeboard. If your concerns are about the behavior of an editor, try one of the administrator noticeboards. Continuing to re-add the post to Graemp's user talk is eventually going to be seen as disruptive and edit warring and will not help you resolve this matter. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Good evening, I see you have been involved in discussion over candidate names, I have opened a wider discussion about this here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom (section 9). I tried to ping you from that discussion, but I'm not sure if it's possible to ping an ip-user so thought I'd let you know about it here. Frinton100 ( talk) 22:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. AussieLegend ( ✉) 16:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Psterling92:. Just edit the article! You can edit the Help Desk so you can edit this (I see you've edited it in the past). 80.5.88.70 ( talk) 06:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC) @ Psterling92:. I see you are 75.143.100.148. It might be a good idea to make the edit from your registered account, also to create a user page mentioning your paid position within the school (if you have one). 80.5.88.70 ( talk) 06:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Khadija Shaw, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Alpha4615 (
talk to me)
14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |