{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Guy (
Help!)
13:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)50m race walk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't know if it is appropriate for this administrator to block me as I recently reverted them on the Shaun King talk page. Of all the administrators on Wikipedia to do this, it seems quite strange it would be them. A block until the end of time also seems extremely excessive. I edited two user pages, that's not even against the rules. If you'd like, I will agree not to edit anyones user page. I think I have been very productive editing articles. I greatly improved Clinton Foundation and eToro. I will continue being a productive editor if unblocked. 50m race walk ( talk) 13:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Having read the discussion on WP:ANI and having watched your behaviour on this talk page, I'm strongly in favour of leaving the block in place for the moment, at least. I can see nothing inappropriate in the block, and much inappropriate in your behaviour here. Yamla ( talk) 14:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WP:BRICKS should apply here. A forever block? 50m race walk ( talk) 13:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, your punishment on Wikipedia is determined by how many wiki-friends you have and your past contributions. It is the zeroth unwritten rule of Wikipedia. Now, if you wish to be unblocked, I suggest that you try to understand what you did wrong and lay out you're going to do differently from now on. Here's what you did wrong, based on WP policy. If an uninvolved administrator ( JzG) closes a discussion, you shouldn't revert them, and you really, really shouldn't edit war over reversion. See WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for the steps you need to take in this situation. Believe it or not, people were trying to help you in the ANI, as am I. But prickly demeanour gets the same treatment in response. If you're going to act like a bull in a china shop (BLPs and contentious areas are such areas), you'll be dropped on like a ton of bricks. Now, as it happens, I think the indef block is too harsh, but you're not going to get anywhere unless you recognize the situation. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 02:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)