Hello, I see you have recently left a mesage on my talk page. To elaborate on the fact that this is a new account, I am the owner of "Peter Horid 1" which I no longer use. If you need me to confirm this, I can record a video of me logging into the account. As for the autoconfirmed userbox, I have now removed it as it has only been recently that I realized that you also need 4 days on wikipedia to be autoconfirmed and not just 10 edits. I take full responsibility in this mistake. Also, do you have a wikipedia account as we might get mixed up with IPs on further conversations. Lakwat ( talk) 10:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
After reading through your posts at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Editors_who_do_not_speak_English I gave a quick look at your contribution history. I think you mean well, but your posture is incredibly combative, and you should tone it down significantly. Stuff like this talk page post or that edit summary or that one are understandable if they are one-off occurences on a bad day, but those are representative of ~30% of your edit summaries. This personal attack, alone, would probably have been enough to earn you a one-day block (if it had been reported on the day you wrote it).
I would advise that you write your messages on the internet as if you were speaking them face to face to a man with big muscles, a low intellect and a short temper. This will greatly improve how friendly the messages back will be. Tigraan Click here to contact me 12:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
bridge was built over river in 18th century" then the only edit summary you need to leave upon changing it to "
the bridge was built over the river in the 18th century" is simply the word "copyedit". Again, this is something which is clearly making you very agitated in some way or another, and out of sincere concern I have to recommend that you try getting away from Wikipedia for a while. Watch a movie, play a video game, read a novel. HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk) 14:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for no apparent reason, so I cannot bring the extraordinarily destructive edits of User:The Banner to any wider attention. They are pure vandalism. The most egregious example: [1], and their edit summary "Revert unhelpful edits". With that, they have restored:
This editor, User:The Banner, says that they are Dutch on their user page. So perhaps they simply do not realise how bad this writing is in English. That is the only possible way I could describe their restoration of this abysmal material as something other than vandalism.
So that's the state of Wikipedia after twenty years. Millions of articles contain basic writing errors, and fixing those errors is not just not appreciated, it's actively and aggressively resisted. 37.152.231.40 ( talk) 09:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
37.152.231.40 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not done anything to warrant being blocked for any time at all, let alone a month. This block appears to be in response to me criticising Wikipedia for its shockingly low standards. Meanwhile, it appears to have given license to an editor who has actually gone and restored many of the serious errors that I had fixed (see [2]; most absurd example of awful quality text being re-added by them is probably this one). Thus, the block has certainly not prevented any damage to Wikipedia but has instead caused it. 37.152.231.40 ( talk) 09:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed LTA. 331dot ( talk) 09:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
37.152.231.40 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
"Confirmed LTA" is a false claim. There is no "LTA". That claim is absurd. All my edits improved articles, and blocking me has caused damage to Wikipedia by encouraging a non-English speaker to restore grammar errors and other major problems to articles. 37.152.231.40 (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see no reason whatsoever to believe the block is incorrect. Yamla ( talk) 13:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Removing TPA to prevent further timewasting on this IP. 331dot ( talk) 10:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |