Hello, 3142, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Presidentman
talk ·
contribs
Random Picture of the Day (
Talkback)
23:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
My understanding of the clause "If page A has subsequently been edited" in
WP:Moving a page#Undoing a move implies that your reversion didn't help, because the mere presence of additional revisions on the redirect would have required {{
db-move}}
to be used anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong (I probably am...)
Do you agree with the specific categorization, and is it okay for me to re-revert if the move request fails? -- SoledadKabocha ( talk) 18:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Can you re-open my nom, please? Tenebris' objections, though persistent, are baseless. The meaning of my blurb and Bellemora's altblurb is virtually identical, although hers is clearer and I support it. AlexTiefling ( talk) 08:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
331dot ( talk) 10:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Circa 3 years ago you added a failed verification tag to the Systolic array page.
The original statement read "Systolic arrays were invented by Richard P. Brent and H. T. Kung, who developed them to compute greatest common divisors of integers and polynomials.[1][failed verification]"
Current formulation is "Early applications include computing greatest common divisors of integers and polynomials.[1][failed verification]"
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but after briefly familiarizing myself with the mentioned source, I get the impression that the current statement no longer needs the failed verification tag. If you agree, please remove the tag. I would prefer to remove it myself instead of bothering you with it, but there may be something I've missed and the tag still applies. 213.175.41.130 ( talk) 12:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)