From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page MIME on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dwaipayan ( talk) 11:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply

January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rapido ( talk) 19:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply

May 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Sarahj2107. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pen because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Suri 100. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Suri 100 ( talk) 10:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian general election, 2014. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Gilliam ( talk) 12:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Virtual LAN seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gilliam ( talk) 13:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bangalore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - BilCat ( talk) 14:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Hello. The article uses Bangalore, both in the article name and at the top of the infobox, and not Bengaluru, since Bangalore is the common name of the city in English throughout the world, including in common practical use in India, even though the official name has changed. Because the official change of the name only applies to official use within India, not worldwide, and most definitely not on Wikipedia. So stop trying to change it in the article, or you risk being blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 14:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply

July 2015

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Carrom. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam ( talk) 09:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Carrom. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Gilliam ( talk) 09:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm AKS.9955. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of people from Uttar Pradesh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Patanjali Ayurved have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd ( talk) 23:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Karate (software), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply