Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Irvine Royal Academy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
11:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Horst Hof. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Michelle Ballantyne without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Horst Hof (
talk)
10:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Michelle Ballantyne, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Shellwood (
talk)
11:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Gillian Martin, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
09:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Lanark—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Forfar. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
15:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Lanark, you may be
blocked from editing. -
Arjayay (
talk)
15:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Stenhousemuir. -
Arjayay (
talk)
15:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
George Adam, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
ButterCashier (
talk)
12:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Jerry Springer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Plandu (
talk)
14:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 17:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the message you left on my Talk page, please see my reply here. Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle ( talk) 15:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |