Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Alicia Machado. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nika de Hitch ( talk) 11:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Zigzig20s. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies ( talk) 16:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~
Rob13
Talk
07:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)This claim of "policy evasion" is nonsense ... there were no edits from this address since the previous warning, and I have no idea how to do such "evading" or what it would consist of. But then, neither do I care about this block ... I had no intention of editing over the next week or the foreseeable future. -- 184.189.217.210 ( talk) 04:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
184.189.217.210 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no previous block to evade. There was no block on this IP address, and no edits were made by this IP address between the time of the warning above and the block, nor by the user of this IP address under any other guise. And while it is conceivable that that some other person received a block as a logged in user while using this dynamic IP address and then the IP address was reallocated to me and then the above warning was issued, that doesn't seem plausible given the time frame. So there was never any basis for this block. At the very least, the evasion block should specify what block is being evaded. As it is, it's a charge based on secret evidence. 184.189.217.210 ( talk) 23:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you don't care about this block
, and since you have no intention of editing over the next week or the foreseeable future
, there is not reason to unblock you. By the way, the block that is being evaded is clearly noted in the
block log.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
13:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting NPA block of IP user. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Tom Petty. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Binksternet ( talk) 07:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |