Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Comcast, please cite a
reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Chris
(talk)
20:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, 143.231.249.141. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Mark Critz, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ian.thomson ( talk) 19:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jojalozzo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Glen Burnie High School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Joja
lozzo
00:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Heisman Trophy because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. –
–
Gareth Griffith-Jones/
The Welsh Buzzard
17:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Jack Kingston, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Mojoworker (
talk)
20:23, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jamesx12345. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Litotes, with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jamesx
1
2345
14:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Kevin Yoder because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
17:21, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Denmark, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Kevin Yoder. While
objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
Arbor8 (
talk)
19:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Tulsi Gabbard. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
04:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Frosty. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
BHL with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
Frosty
☃
21:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to
Ham seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks! –
Gilliam (
talk)
20:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the
Almost Famous plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the
plot summary
edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for
films,
musicals,
television episodes,
anime/manga,
novels and
non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
DonIago (
talk)
14:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Title III, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit, while helpful, appeared to just be a copy and paste of that section of Title III. That can just simply be a reference, from within the section.
Julian the Shadow | (
Talk |
Contribs)
14:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the
Hayes Davenport article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a
neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as
this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see
the Help Desk page. Thank you!
Coretheapple (
talk)
14:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
Zip-line because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page or take a look at our
guidelines about links. Thanks. --
allthefoxes (
Talk)
17:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
R. Donahue Peebles has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JWNoctis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Nowruz— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
JW
Noctistalk to me
15:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
2602:306:3357:BA0:8020:B1BF:796B:6005. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Betsy Ross has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
2602:306:3357:BA0:8020:B1BF:796B:6005 (
talk)
19:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Tom Marino, you may be
blocked from editing. You should not be editing articles like this because you have an
apparent conflict of interest. Further, you've added nonsense partisan content while removing sourced neutral content. It would be easy to not only have you blocked from editing but also expose your edit history to a wider audience who critique Congressional staffers trying to abuse Wikipedia.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
14:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Tom Marino.
DVdm (
talk)
18:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Unrepentantly editing the page for *cough* US Conngressman Pat Tiberi: https://twitter.com/congressedits/status/831244413439442945 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plebs Tribune ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 143.231.249.141. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Pat Tiberi, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 21:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Rick Perry— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
19:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Rick Perry. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DrStrauss
talk
19:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jdcomix. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Tom MacArthur without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jdcomix (
talk)
16:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Talk:Elise Stefanik, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Seagull123 Φ 21:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Reb1981. I noticed that you recently removed content from
United States House Committee on Appropriations without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Reb1981 (
talk)
21:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Internship. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AnAwesomeArticleEditor ( talk) 22:53, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
AnAwesomeArticleEditor (
talk)
17:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I noticed that in
this edit to
French Hill (politician), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk)
16:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Spine. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
15:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Dusty Johnson, you may be
blocked from editing.
Drmies (
talk)
20:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lemonaka. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
United States Capitol subway system, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Lemonaka (
talk)
18:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DreamRimmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Nikki Fried, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DreamRimmer (
talk)
17:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (
talk)
17:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DB1729. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Template:Theodore Roosevelt series without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
DB1729
talk
21:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |