This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
STOP DELETING MY COMMENTS ON CASSOPOLIS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.120.139.4 ( talk • contribs) 00:06, 1 Dec 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that a user had vandelized this page but good. I reverted it and gave him a warning. -- Iriseyes 03:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
About the email you sent me about me said Vandelized list of Camp Lazlo Characters,I didn't vandelized.You just Offend me and made me look bad.- User:Kongsaurus12.
will not happen again.I had no idea that the change really changed like it did.Wow! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 166.82.46.18 ( talk • contribs) 07:15, 17 Dec 2006 (UTC)
Not sure why you changed those Marvin Minsky citations. Those were edits he made on the cite, so the self-referring citation was evident. Maybe you have good intentions, but the road to bad editing is paved with such. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.96.191.184 ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 17 Dec 2006 (UTC)
SORRY BOUT THAT. DIDNt KNOW ABOUT A SANDBOX. WILL NOT DO AGAIN. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.40.115.114 ( talk) 00:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
When you prod an article you are requested to notify the author. You didn't notify me even though you did at least use a meaningful edit summary. Note the Prod tag itself states:
I dispute the proposed deletion but will put more effort into justifying notability under WP:Corp as per your tag however, as I am on a wikibreak - it may take a few days.-- Golden Wattle talk 18:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
As a matter of courtesy, you should take the direction of "please consider" a little more seriously if you wish to actively engage in new page patrolling as per the user box on your user page. Wikipedia:Civility is one of the core principles of this project and leaving a message explaining your actions is in line with that principle. Not everybody may pick up the tagging in their watch lists.-- Golden Wattle talk 19:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
In order to check where the AfD was at I looked at your recent contributions. You have been doing between 5 and 7 edits per minute welcoming people this morning (my time); between 6.14 and 6.18 am you welcomed 33 new users. Are you running a bot? You aren't registered as having done so.-- Golden Wattle talk 21:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I was just looking through the assessment logs over at WikiProject Airports and noticed that you had created Krasnoyarsk Yemelyanovo Airport earlier this month. I was just wondering if perhaps you'd care to join as a participant. We could always use new users helping out, but if you're too busy, I understand. Thanks! thadius856 talk| airports| neutrality 21:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
In withdrawing your nomination, you stated "Nomination for article was based on this state, but creator quickly asserted notability after AFD warning" That state and the nomination was at 6:01 am my time (Australian Eaastern Daylight Saving). [1]. I regard this view of events as disingenuous. I had already notified you on your talk page before that time (several minutes) that "I dispute the proposed deletion but will put more effort into justifying notability under WP:Corp as per your tag however, as I am on a wikibreak - it may take a few days." [2] Your prompt nominating for AFD despite my assurance that I would indeed put effort into justifying notability but that it would take a few days, was neither assuming good faith, nor in my view civil. However, I am pleased that other members of the community unanimously supported my efforts.-- Golden Wattle talk 20:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Just wondering if you can fill me in on a particularly ignorant editor as you seem to have had some history with him. SEGA ( talk · contribs) and his IP socks 67.33.61.18 ( talk · contribs), 68.112.25.197 ( talk · contribs) have a LONG history of vandalism, disruption, personal attacks and other complete disregard/disrespect for Wikipedia policies and guidelines. How has this user been able to fly under to radar so long without getting ban-hammered? Do you know of any admins who are familiar with the edit history of this individual and can put a permanent anchor on him? I know you've had numerous conflicts with him in the past...I just thought I'd ask. Cheers and take care! Anger22 ( Talk 2 22) 18:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey mate, how are you? I just wanted to report this annoyance, there is this guy who keeps himself really busy removing links, and he does catch some spamlinks, but he also deletes references, and external links that are compliant with guidelines. It almost seems as if he automatically deletes links that were placed after a certain date, but that's just my observation. I made multiple attempts to talk to him on his talk page and ask him to stop repeatedly removing links on stuff that I have on my watchlist but I can't get a hold of him. It probably has to do with his ip number constantly changing, the last 2 or 3 numbers are different sometimes: like 66.38.39.121 and 66.38.39.81 I think.
I think if he continues vandalizing random links he should get a (temp) ban, if he seriously wanted to help wikipedia out he should register an account right? regards, GerardK 21:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Would appreciate you looking into user GerardK history. He is totally reversing whatever I am working on cleaning up in the wiki. Without even looking at what changes have been made. Most of the sites are blatant spam and he reverses them to be back into the wiki. I really don't know if he has the integrity of the wiki at the foremost. If he is proud to be a Wkikipedian as his user page says, then he should treat it as something serious and not something just to build links to boost his personal pages in the search engines. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.38.39.146 ( talk • contribs) 15:15, 12 Dec 2006 (UTC)
At the virtual classroom, we've got a discussion going on about vandalism. You are invited to add your comments and share your expertise.
The Transhumanist 23:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, moe.Ron. Thank you for reverting my change to the Neopaganism page. This has motivated me to get a wikipdia login name for myself. I have been very dissapointed to watch the Neopagan page change - it looks like people just keep fighting over edits, which makes me sad. This was a very good entry just last June when I first read it, but now it seems full of fighting, and cautionary tags - often without backup of why these tags were placed over on the talk page.
I removed the banner because I did not see any backup argument for the tag in the discussion section. Perhaps I missed this. 68.158.183.225
Techncialy I could speedy delete it. Prod seems a reasonable compramise. Geni
Your attack against me for making comments about the provenance of information in Wikipedia is entirely out of line. Asking for sources is in no way related to the policy diatribe entitled "Wikipedia is not a soapbox." Your behavior is consistent with a pattern of harassment against all who dare to suggest that Wikipedia is not all fanatics claim it to be. I suggest you direct your comments at the content of articles, and avoid attacking those of us who find a better approach to literary analysis than fawning praise of our own creations.
I am not restoring my comments to the Lerdo page because I located the source in the article for the information in question. I did restore the comment after I found your notice on my talk page accepting my supposed gratitude, which I did not offer, for help that you did not offer and that I did not request. You will find I don't comply well with efforts to patronize me.
I notice you lacked the concern to remove the {(fact)} tag that my perfectly appropriate comments explained. I will post the comments on any and every geography article that I find lacking sources. All US geography articles lack sources. All US geography articles are copied from official sources. All such articles are plagiarized. If Wikipedia doesn't want to be the venue where the merit of its content is discussed, perhaps its secret administrators would better appreciate their systematic plagiarism being discussed in the New York Times and in the Washington Post.
I demand that you desist from misrepresenting that I somehow am using Wikipedia as a soapbox when I offer accurate analysis that describes unsourced copied material as plagiarism. I demand an apology and I encourage you to recognize that your message to me was in no way based on any reasonable premise, but instead is part of a pattern in which irrelevant Wikipedia policy and guidelines are tossed about in preparation for more serious administrative attacks against those who criticize particular aspects of Wikipedia's literary merit, or lack thereof as the case might be. Marakopa 04:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Please see WP:SIG for guidelines regarding user signatures. They recommend that you do not use big text, be sparing with superscript or subscript, be sparing with color, and point out that signatures that take up more than two or three lines in the edit window clutter the page and make it harder to distinguish posts from signatures. Not that I'm particularly annoyed by it, but you may get hassled for it at some point. - Freekee 06:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I would like to contribute the information about Warf Rats to the Deadheads article, but as you know with so much of the Deadhead culture and history, it was in the 'oral' tradition. What would you suggest.
Cheers Spruceforest 22:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Moeron, thanks, I will. And apparently I'm a mad man! I really don't get this user, they made some genuinely good edits to start with, but then it all went a bit wrong. Hope the whole thing can be resolved, it really gets on my nerves that they're being so silly. Madder 02:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm wondering as to the purpose of this category; wouldn't it be better to move these books all into Category:Dragonlance novels? D dc c 23:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Just wondering how your "investigations" on the photo troll were going? I see he's taken his frustration out on your user page.(and mine also) Which is a new level of low for the user. Quite a few new User account socks appeared over the Christmas weekend as well. What's next? Anger22 ( Talk 2 22) 15:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
When you have completed this Request for Checkuser, you can move the page to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RFC, and then list it at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Pending. DarthVad e r 23:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you welcome noobs. I am doing research in prep for the welcomebot trail in order to establish some facts on new user trends. Please can you have a look at Category:WelcomeBotResearch. I would appreciate your involvement. Also so as to assist, please can you sub your welcome template with {{ welcome123}} which includes that category. Thanks. frummer 02:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you added {{ WPBiography}} to Talk:LeRoi_Moore. You could improve that by adding {{WPBiography|musician-work-group=yes}} which tags the page for the WPBiography "sub"-project WikiProject Musicians at the same time. Cheers and best wishes for a happy new year, BNutzer 03:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)