The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You know, this article is clearly by someone who is familiar with Wikipedia and wikicode. Because unlike most webcomic fangush entries, this is actually a good article on the subject. It fails on a few points however, the article is written by the webcomic artist, a User:Metal-Geo. The website has been online for less than 2 months, and the Alexa ranking is almost 2 million. - Hahnch e n 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Is this a notable website? Is it a notable webcomic? You can have a look here and the answer should be a resounding no. Their forums house 70 members, and Alexa has never heard of them. This is one of many non-notable webcomics currently residing at Wikipedia, let's put a stop to it. - Hahnch e n 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 05:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
This webcomic has appeared on Wikipedia since December 2004, you can find the webcomic here. For a website which has been established for 3 years, you'd expect there to be more than 53 Google hits, and maybe a better Alexa rank than 2.8 million. This is not a notable webcomic. - Hahnch e n 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:59, 10 April 2006]
This webcomic, found here has been online for just over 6 months. The website has an Alexa rank of around 800,000. A google for "Sticks and Stones" would obviously bring back millions of hits, so I tried a search for "Sticks and Stones" "Jordan Neufeld" search (Neufeld being the author), and it came back with 9 hits. Now the search wasn't exactly scientific, but 9 hits? I don't think that's notable. - Hahnch e n 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:59, 10 April 2006]
As far as I can tell, this page is promotion for a marginal esoteric Buddhist group. A lot of the information on this page is accurate, but not specific to this group; rather, it is describing Chinese tantric Buddhism in general. A google search for "Holy Tantra Jin-Gang-Dhyana Buddhism" turns up a couple official sites followed immediately by the Wikipedia article. This modern group might be an interesting subject for an article, but, unfortunately, the article as it exists gives us no context about them. Nat Krause( Talk!) 00:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was KEEP. NTK 20:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Dosn't seem to me as a notable person, othervise it seems lika an copyvio, but I can't assert that → A z a Toth 00:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:59, 10 April 2006]
Non-notable Georgia socialite and minor philantropist, otherwise unremarkable. This isn't the Atlanta Journal-Constitution obit page. Calton | Talk 00:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep, no consensus. SushiGeek 22:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Non-notable Greek model with seven Google hits. Was tagged w/nn-bio when text read "one of Greece's fashion models" Was Prod'ed after weasel wording added, but Prod tag removed by article creator. Calton | Talk 00:21, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Have you tried google search in GREEK!!??? Luka Jačov 18:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 22:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Someone's attempt to promote their original research: non-notable -- essentially invisible -- economic question: gets all of 34 Google hits, none from .edu sites. Calton | Talk 00:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. — FireFox • T [21:00, 10 April 2006]
was speedied; trombonist for one quite notable and one semi-notable ska band, Reel Big Fish and Littlest Man Band respectively. no strong feelings either way as nom, but leaning towards keep. He: ah? 00:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [21:01, 10 April 2006]
Vanity page created by friend. Gremagor 00:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
No widespread news coverage of any such drought (we already have an article on the Horn of Africa crisis), partially original research. PROD tag was removed by original starter (and to date, only editor) of the article, when it was titled "Worldwide Drought of 2005-06", and had even more speculative statements. Are we really sure it was a La Nina-caused drought? Strong delete. NSL E ( T+ C) at 00:53 UTC ( 2006-04-08)
The result of the debate was KEEP. NTK 05:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Non Notable Dunstan 00:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Non notable-- Zxcvbnm 01:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was SPEEDY REDIRECT. NTK 05:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
There's already a Brazilian Labour Party article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtrielli ( talk • contribs)
The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 07:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
A non-notable quarterly which began quite recently. Article is mostly an ad, and issues introduced via {{ prod}} were never addressed or commented on. google home page Harmil 04:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 07:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewasite
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [21:03, 10 April 2006]
Wikipedia isn't a directory or free web space. Delete Ardenn 02:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
nn comic book character. Prod deleted. Google shows 610 total hits, including wikis, false positives etc.
⇒
SWATJester
Ready
Aim
Fire! 02:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak Delete I'm 85% sure this page isnt notable. If we do keep it, I reccomend it be merged into an article about Hewlett-Packard or some such. Also, if we do keep it, it needs work to pass WP:NPOV —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dalamori ( talk • contribs) .
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [21:03, 10 April 2006]
Advertising for small nn ISP and web host. Can find nothing on the internet about them (number of customers, turnover, location, etc) other than company website.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana boyd
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [21:05, 10 April 2006]
AFAIK this is unsourced propaganda. If it does have any basis in reality (which I sincerely doubt), it can be easily covered in the Chetniks article estavisti 04:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [14:59, 09 April 2006]
Delete - nn vanity/spam. Wickethewok 04:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore( T) 17:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Actor with no presence on imdb. I proded it, but User:Laceymichelle claims he is well-known in the Seychelles. Eivind t @ c 05:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep, no consensus. SushiGeek 07:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)