A key early text was Florovsky's 1937 book, The Paths of Russian Theology,[3] which criticized Russian religious thought and argued that it was negatively influenced by Catholic
scholasticism, Protestant
pietism and
moralism. The book urged Russian orthodox to hold to the patristic tradition and avoid these influences.[1]
This book was widely popular.[4]
^Georgii Florovskii, Putt russkogo bogosloviia, 3d ed., preface by J. MeyendorfF (Paris: YMCA-Press, 1983). The first edition appeared in 1937. English trans.: The Ways of Russian Theology trans. Robert L. Nichols, vols. 5-6 of The Collected Works of Georges Florovsky, ed. Richard S. Haugh (Belmont, MA: Nordland Publishing Company, 1979; Vaduz: Büchervertriebsanstalt, 1987).
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (2 September 2020), "Varieties of Neopatristics", in Emerson, Caryl; Pattison, George; Poole, Randall A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Russian Religious Thought, Oxford University Press, pp. 527–542,
doi:
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198796442.013.32,
ISBN978-0-19-879644-2
Gavrilyuk, Paul (2015). Georges Florovsky and the Russian religious renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-874537-2.
OCLC930017176.
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (19 December 2014). "Ecclesiological and Epistemological Contours of Neopatristic Theology". Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance. Oxford University Press. pp. 220–231.
doi:
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701583.003.0014.
ISBN978-0-19-870158-3.
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (2 September 2013). "Florovsky's Neopatristic Synthesis and the Future Ways of Orthodox Theology". Orthodox Constructions of the West. Fordham University Press. pp. 102–124.
doi:
10.5422/fordham/9780823251926.003.0007.
ISBN978-0-8232-5192-6.
Gallaher, Brandon (7 September 2011). ""waiting For The Barbarians": Identity And Polemicism In The Neo-Patristic Synthesis Of Georges Florovsky*". Modern Theology. 27 (4). Wiley: 659–691.
doi:
10.1111/j.1468-0025.2011.01707.x.
ISSN0266-7177.
Reid, Duncan (1999). "The End of Matter: Some Ecojustice Principles in the Neo-Patristic Vision". Ecotheology. 4 (7). United Kingdom: Sheffield Academic Press.
doi:
10.1558/ecotheology.v4i1.1786.
ISSN1749-4907.
Moses the Hagiorite (22 August 2007).
"Meta-Patristic Theology: Are the Fathers Relevant Today?". Orthodox Christian Information Center. Translated by Dragas, George D. Retrieved 13 December 2020. Republished from Moses the Hagiorite (Winter 2014). "Meta-Patristic Theology: Are the Fathers Relevant Today?". The Presbyter. Vol. 15. GOA‘s Archdiocesan Presbyters Council. p. 15.
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (1 November 2012).
"The Orthodox Renaissance". First Things. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
Nesteruk, A. (2015). Cosmology in view of a Neopatristic Synthesis: St Maximus the Confessor’s elucidation of the creation of the world. In R. C. H. Witt (Ed.), Cosmological Viewpoints: Selected papers from the Smolian (2004) and other conferences of the International Association “Cosmos and Philosophy” St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
Reid, Duncan (1999) The End of Matter: Some Ecojustice Principles in the Neo-Patristic Vision. Ecotheology, 7. pp. 59-70. ISSN 1363-7320
Sauve, Ross,Joseph (2010) Georges V. Florovsky And Vladimir N. Lossky: An Exploration, Comparison And Demonstration Of Their Unique Approaches To The Neopatristic Synthesis. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.
http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/591/