From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Verifiability is undoubtedly an important part of Wikipedia, but sometimes original research is fine. Usually, statements like "Discrimination can be divided into sex, race, language, age and more.[ original research?]" [1] should be understood by readers. A few other examples include "The Pope is the current leader of the Holy See.[ original research?]" [2], "Most people have five fingers and toes on their hands and foot.[ original research?]" [3] or "Paris is the capital of France.[ original research?]" [4] Usually they are understood, but in some cases (for example, the sky is blue) could be misunderstood or even unable to understand by some. [5] However, remember, someone will always not understand something - in that case, be nice and assume good faith.

See also Information

Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
Wikipedia:Citation overkill

Footnotes

  1. ^ If it wasn't like that, those wikipedia pages would not even exist.
  2. ^ Everyone should know that christianity exists - it is the largest religion in the world anyway. Due to that, practically everyone also knows that the pope has some form of control.
  3. ^ Look at your hands, and your feet. What do you see? Five fingers and five toes on each hand and foot, right?
  4. ^ While Paris may be an ambiguous word, usually people are referring to the capital of France. Not to mention everyone should know Paris is the capital of France.
  5. ^ Just to explain, some people might think that that statement means that the sky is always blue - however, that should be obvious. Some people are also colorblind or blind, in which case they can't see that the sky is in fact blue during the day; however, I'm guessing they would still know that, not to mention they're a minority - only about 339 million people are colorblind or blind worldwide. And that's including colorblindness where you can see blue.