|
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.-- Fang 23 23:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
At first i thought the links you added were spam but it turned out to not be spam sorry for wrongly accusing you of spamming.-- Fang 23 01:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I think that "labor unionists" or "labour unionists" works fine. It includes trade/craft unionists and industrial unionists. It's used in the USA, but it's also used in the UK, in Canada, and in Australia. So it doesn't appear to be US-centric. But anyway, I'm trying to get centralized discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organized Labour#centralized discussion of category naming, instead of across the many CFDs and user talk pages, as this discussion has bee way too dispersed thus far. If you feel like replying to this message, it would be best to reply over there. Thanks! — coel acan — 22:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
What do you make of this article? Don't the examples seem a bit overly point of view?-- Dr who1975 14:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
You are updating timelines but not the best finish in the infobox, please add it in the infobox also.
michfan2123 00:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
They are fine, they are in many articles and nobody has said anything, the more information the better, it doesn't take up that much space.
michfan2123 15:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)