GA notes
Review carefully — see Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles for more suggestions. You may also ask for the advice of a mentor.
{{subst:GANotice|article=Article|days=7}} ~~~~
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Article you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
Chzz
► 23:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Also same for hold/good/tail; see Template:GANotice for syntax
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 28, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.
Example;
{{subst:GAList |overcom=This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria. |1a=aye|1b=aye |2a=nay|2b=???|2c=aye|2com=The sources are not sufficient to cover the controversial material in section 3 |3a=aye|3b=aye|4=wtf|4com=Is section 3 really neutral? |5=aye|6a=|6b=aye|6com=I'm not convinced that the fair use rationale for the photograph in section 5 is valid |7=nay|7com= Good luck improving the article}}
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
ArticleHistory | action1 = GAN | action1date = ~~~~~ | action1link = Talk:subst:BASEPAGENAME}}/GA1 | action1result = listed
| currentstatus = GA | topic = {{{1}}}
ArticleHistory | action1 = GAN | action1date = 13:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | action1link = Talk:subst:BASEPAGENAME}}/GA1 | action1result = listed
| currentstatus = GA | topic = {{{1}}}