Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful)
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Truck-kun

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruption by an IP editor. O.N.R.  (talk) 17:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq ( talk) 13:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page history edit summary seems to suggest vandalism from a handful of IP accounts. SSSB ( talk) 18:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined It's hard to see edits that meet vandalism. If needed, ask again and please be more specific. Johnuniq ( talk) 13:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Vatican City national football team

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Unknown-Tree🌲? ( talk) 21:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq ( talk) 13:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

All India Sevens Football

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Details at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

PTV News Tonight

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continuously changing redirect. CNMall41 ( talk) 07:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Gabriel Sara

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation about proposed transfer (which is not confirmed). Joseph 2302 ( talk) 08:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Syro; ...I Care Because You Do; Drukqs; Richard D. James Album

7-day semi-protection: High level of IP-hopping vandalism and edit warring. Cambial — foliar❧ 09:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

List of Space Shuttle crews

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Yuthoob ( talk) 09:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 11:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Rohit Purohit

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan ( talk | contributions) 10:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Youssoufa Moukoko

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 11:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Jean-Philippe Mateta

Reason: High level of racist vandalism from IP users. VampireKilla ( talk) 11:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent infobox vandalism by unconfirmed users. ― Jochem van Hees ( talk) 11:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Radhe Shyam

Reason: Ip vandalism by changing boxoffice numbers and removing sources. RangersRus ( talk) 13:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

National Assembly (Kuwait)

Reason: IP account changing all indicatives and verbs to the past tense on this page, due to the fact that the assembly is TEMPORARILY suspended. The assembly still exists and the constitutional mechanisms related to it still exist, but *some* are temporarily suspended for constitutional re-assessment. Abdulhakim1917 ( talk) 13:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

University of Rajshahi

Reason: IP vandalism Yuthoob ( talk) 14:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{ Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{ Edit protected}}, {{ Edit template-protected}}, {{ Edit extended-protected}}, or {{ Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{ Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Fred Trump

Change name to Freidrick Drumpf. That was the name he was born with. Any other name is inacurate and therefore a falsehood. This has been verified by Snopes as Fred Trumps actual Birth Name. 24.127.197.150 ( talk) 07:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Not done – According to this Snopes article, At any rate, neither Trump nor his father ever bore the surname Drumpf, and whether Trump's grandfather anglicized that name at some point remains unclear. Favonian ( talk) 11:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
And there appears to be a filter. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 11:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Requests for permissions

User:Avicennasis/todo/Header

Current requests

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PARAKANYAA

Has created roughly 30 articles by my count; only one stub, my spotchecks found nothing concerning. Diverging Diamond (is Queen of Hearts's alt; talk) 19:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Is there any indication that the user wants autopatrolled? I don't want to throw rights at someone who would prefer that their creations be reviewed by NPP/AfC. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@ Red-tailed hawk: Unlike other PERMs, third party nominations for autopatrolled are welcome (preferred even), because it's primarily a tool used by NPP to manage its workload rather than a tool used by the holder to edit. If someone really doesn't want it for some reason, they can of course ask for it to be removed. –  Joe ( talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@ Red-tailed hawk I would be open to having it. Hypothetically I like the idea of someone else checking my articles or critiquing them, but no one who has patrolled my articles has ever really made a significant change or tagged anything, so it hasn't really helped there lol, so if it reduces the NPP workload and gets the page indexed faster I don't see why not. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 13:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
In that case, I have no objection to granting the right. — Red-tailed sock  (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 13:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Losipov

For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov ( talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ( [1]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:NyanThousand

Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand ( talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Sir MemeGod

I will use AWB to tag galaxy-related (and other astronomical objects) with the appropriate talk page banners (WP:ASTRONOMICAL OBJECTS), and will use it to tag "Weather of _____" with the corresponding task force talk page banner tags. I can also use it for typos on long tornado articles, which tend to have misspellings in them. Sir MemeGod ._. ( talk - contribs - created articles) 05:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Isaac Rabinovitch

Hoping it will make nitpicky edit somewhat less tedious. Isaac Rabinovitch ( talk) 18:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)


Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Sorin Balanel (Victoriabank)

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Sorin Balanel (Victoriabank) ( talk) 14:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done; no reason given. This will be granted automatically when you meet the requirements listed above. stwalkerster ( talk) 16:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

User:EtaoinShrdlu1234

I probably will not be extended confirmed because I have made few edits. etaoin shrdlu( cmfwyp| vbgkqj) 14:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. This will be granted automatically when you meet the requirements listed above. stwalkerster ( talk) 16:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
But it has been more than 30 days! etaoin shrdlu( cmfwyp| vbgkqj) 21:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
You need to meet both the 30 day requirement and the 500 edits requirement. At the moment, you've only made 73 edits. stwalkerster ( talk) 23:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I thought it was 30 edits within 500 days! etaoin shrdlu( cmfwyp| vbgkqj) 13:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

User:TSL Public

My legitimate alt-account. – The Sharpest Lives ( 💬• ✏️• ℹ️) ( ping me!) 15:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done stwalkerster ( talk) 16:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

User:DucaTux

I ask permission to translate from English to Italian and viceversa without waiting for the 30 days and 500 edits limits... I would like to add more information about my family and my ancestors (Barattucci, in Wikipedia I found only Antonio: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Barattucci) but I don't think I will reach 500 edits during this process.. and I'd like to translate the pages into English too. Also, I'd like to translate into Italian the page of the Adragna family ( /info/en/?search=Adragna_family), one of its member is my friend Marta Adragna and she asked me to create the Italian version. Thanks in advance, Fabio Barattucci. DucaTux ( talk) 22:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:HRShami

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Xegma

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? —  48 JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@ 48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. –  Joe ( talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason ( WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Iwaqarhashmi

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ( [2]). — MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar 💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar 💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Florificapis

I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and applying CSD whenever necessary. Florificapis ( talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Rusty Cat

I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty  🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:KingSkyLord

I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

User:ToadetteEdit

Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. Toadette Edit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

User:PadFoot2008

I was granted pagemover rights nearly a month back, but due to mistakes on my part, the rights have been now revoked. So, I am requesting the rights again on Primefac's advice, explaining why I made the mistakes and how I shall avoid those mistakes going forward.

  • On 30 July, I moved British Indian Army to Indian Army (1895–1947) after which Celia Homeford informed me that the move had been unilateral, following which I immediately proceeded to check the talk page of the article for previous RMs, which I did find and had resulted in the move of Indian Army (1895–1947) to British Indian Army. I hadn't checked the talk page before swapping the page and thus had not been aware of this RM when I had swapped — a mistake on my part. I had checked the WP:COMMONNAME of the article and sought to make the article title WP:Consistent with other historical army related articles like German Army (1935–1945) for instance. I should've checked the talk page and it's archives for any previous RMs and discussions before making the swap. That is what I usually do before making a move or a swap, but this step had slipped my mind in this case. In future, I shall make sure to always check the talk page and the archives for RMs and discussions regarding the article title without fail before making a move or a swap.

I've learnt from my mistakes and hope not to repeat them. I also aim to minimise any chance of any other mistakes on my part. PadFoot ( talk) 17:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ( [3]). — MusikBot talk 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Lordseriouspig

I've been doing RCP for a little while now, and recently started NPP. I believe I could assist in patrolling recent changes to expand on my anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli ( talk | contribs) 18:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Fsrvb

I've been doing patrolling for a little while now, and recently started seriously devoting time. I believe I will submit myself in patrolling recent changes in contributing to anti-vandalism work. Thanks Fsrvb ( talk) 19:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 5 days and has 28 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 00:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

User:AlexBobCharles

I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles ( talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)


Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Lordseriouspig

I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? - Fastily 10:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t believe I'm not, @ Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lord serious pig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? - Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @ Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lord serious pig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for your honesty. Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? - Fastily 23:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
No problem, @ Fastily I’ll definitely try to leave warnings for every revert I make. Thanks, Lord serious pig 02:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for confirming  Done - Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

User:P1

I've been recent changes patrolling on and off with Twinkle, and more recently Ultraviolet, for years now, and would like to try Huggle's more advanced tools. I have over 1.4k mainspace edits, no history of edit warring, and consistently and appropriately notify editors whose changes I revert. P1(she/her, talk/ contribs) 04:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges ( Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

User:LR.127

I've been viewing recent changes for a while with Twinkle, and would like to keep using the Android app to prevent vandalism, which requires rollback permissions.

I am aware, after reading others' requests, that warning users after edits must be done every single time. While there are moments in which I have forgot to do this in the past, I will ensure to make it a consistency going forward. LR.127 ( talk) 00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? - Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BrandonXLF

I am a frequent editor and creator of templates and modules, and I have encountered several instances where having the template editor permission would be helpful. Many of my requested edits on protected templates have been performing minor visual fixes or fixing small bugs with the template's logic. For these uncontroversial edits, having to submit a request and involve another editor feels unnecessary, considering the nature of the requested edits. In other cases with more significant changes, going through the edit request process works fine for the most part, but I like to be able to avoid the process because of the backlog the edit queue can have at times and the added potential confusion added by having to request technical changes. Because of this, I'd much rather be able to have a standard discussion on template talk pages, if necessary, followed by implementing the agreed upon changes myself rather than having to request someone else to implement the changes. In the near future, I plan on exploring adding support for the new dark mode to more templates and being able to implement these changes on protected templates myself would be of great help. In the future, I would also like to use my technical knowledge of wikitext and Lua to help with processing the template edit request queue.

Another issue that the template editor permission would resolve is that several templates I've created or rewrote are now template editor protected: Template:For-multi, Template:Country name, Template:Yearly archive list/display, Template:Visible anchor/styles.css, Template:Divbox/styles.css, and Module:Outdent. As a result, I am unable to edit them, which makes several of them difficult to maintain. Per the guidelines, three templates sandboxes I've worked on include Module:Jcon/sandbox, Template:Visible anchor/sandbox/styles.css, and Template:Infobox road/sandbox and at some requested template edits are [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10].

Also, I acknowledge that I performed what ended up being (unintentionally) disruptive templates several years ago. Since then, I have learned a lot about collaborating with others on Wikipedia and being mindful of the impact template edits can have on articles across the wiki. Since then, I have been much more careful with the edits I perform, as these past experiences have shown me the dangers of not doing so. With the template edit permission, I intend to take from these past mistakes, and I will follow the best practices to ensure the template edits I perform are well-tested, agreed upon, and non-disruptive. I find that now I am very cautious with my template edits, and I always create thorough test cases (e.g. Template:Jcon/testcases) before performing changes. – BrandonXLF ( talk) 19:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

After looking at your contributions I'm inclined to grant, but would like to know if Primefac, EdJohnston, or Galobtter (admins who were involved with the placing and then lifting of your sanctions) have thoughts. Elli ( talk | contribs) 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Brandon has definitely matured as an editor since their first go-round with this permission. I've been burned in the past but let's say I'm cautiously optimistic. Primefac ( talk) 12:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
 Done for a three-month trial period. Feel free to request again in October and assuming there weren't any issues in the meantime, I'll be happy to grant the permission indefinitely. Elli ( talk | contribs) 18:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Avicennasis/todo&oldid=756233015"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE