The
field elmcultivarUlmus minor 'Viminalis'[1] (:'willow-like'), occasionally referred to as the twiggy field elm,[2][3] was raised by
Masters in 1817, and listed in 1831 as U. campestris viminalis, without description.[4]Loudon added a general description in 1838,[2] and the Cambridge University Herbarium acquired a leaf specimen of the tree in 1866.
Moss, writing in 1912, said that the Ulmus campestris viminalis from Cambridge University Herbarium was the only elm he thought agreed with the original Plot's elm (not U. minor 'Plotii') as illustrated by
Dr. Plot in 1677 from specimens growing in an avenue and coppice at Hanwell near
Banbury.[5][6]Elwes and
Henry (1913) also considered Loudon's Ulmus campestris viminalis to be Dr Plot's elm.[7] Its 19th-century name, U. campestris var. viminalis, led the cultivar to be classified for a time as a variety of
English Elm.[7] On the Continent, 'Viminalis' was the Ulmus antarctica Hort., 'zierliche Ulme' [:'dainty elm'] of Kirchner's Arboretum Muscaviense (1864).[8]
Melville considered 'Viminalis' one form, the 'type' cultivar,[9] of the natural, variable hybrid,
U. minor ×
U. minor 'Plotii', which occurs in England where the two trees overlap, and which he called, believing U. plotii Druce a species, U. × viminalis.[10] He questioned, however, Henry's claim that 'Viminalis' was Dr Plot's elm. Writing in 1940 and referring to a pencil rubbing in Herb. Druce, vol. 113 of the Sloane Collection, he wrote "I can see no reason to doubt that this is Plot's plant," but "it is [not] U. × viminalis Lodd".[11]Boom (1959)[12] and
Bean (1988)[9] listed 'Viminalis' as a cultivar and the 'type' clone of Melville's U. × viminalis.
Description
Wood (1851) described 'Viminalis' as "a neat-growing compact tree, with small foliage",[13] Henry (1913) as a "tree with ascending branches, pendulous branchlets, and sparse foliage",[7] and
Bean (1981) as a "narrow-headed, rather slender tree".[9] 'Viminalis' is slow-growing; it can ultimately reach 20 m in height.[7][14] Leaves vary from obovate-elliptic to narrowly elliptic; they are deeply serrated, < 5.0 cm long, tapering to a nearly symmetrical base and long-acuminate at the tip, with prominent white
axil tufts on the undersides.[9][7][15] In his description of Ulmus antarctica Hort. (1864), Kirchner added that the leaves are more or less downward-curving, with longish petioles, and that the leaf-margins have numerous deep, double, hook-shaped teeth, "so that the leaves appear almost slit".[8]
Loudon's sketch (below) suggests that a narrow leaf was fairly uniform on his tree. The Cambridge University Herbarium specimen of Loudon's Ulmus campestris viminalis[16] shows leaves resembling both Henry's 'Viminalis' drawing[17] and
Schneider's 'Antarctica' drawing,[18] confirming the synonymy. 'Viminalis' has been likened to Zelkova × verschaffeltii.[19]Bean wrote in 1936, "I have never seen it bearing fruit, although it flowers."[20] The old specimen in Lydiard Street,
Ballarat, Victoria, however (see 'Notable trees'), produces abundant fruit, the seed being close to the marginal notch in somewhat broad
samarae.
Loudon's Ulmus campestris viminalis, with leaf sketch
U. campestris viminalis leaves, Cambridge University Herbarium, labelled 'Herb. J. Lindley, Ph.D., Purchased in 1866'[5]
1912 Gardeners' Chronicle illustration of the same, identifying specimen as Loudon's 'Viminalis'
Leaf-drawing of Elwes & Henry's 'type' tree (1913)
Foliage of 'Viminalis' saplings cloned from the tree in Lydiard St,
Ballarat, Victoria
Same
Pests and diseases
'Viminalis' is very susceptible to
Dutch elm disease, as are the natural hybrids between field elm and plot elm (Melville's U. × viminalis), of which the type cultivar is usually considered an example.
Cultivation
'Viminalis' was valued for its ornamental qualities, Wood (1851) considering it "well adapted for the back part of shrubberies".[13]Bean (1936) called it "a charming small tree for gardens, very elegant and not growing fast",[20] while the catalogue of Hillier & Sons,
Winchester, Hampshire, (1958) described it as "an extremely graceful, slender tree of slow growth, easily distinguished from all other elms by its narrow, fimbriated leaves".[21] Kirchner noted that the tree is not sensitive to frost.[8] Specimens were present in many of the major UK collections, including
Cambridge University Botanic Garden (see 'Notable trees' below),
Kew Gardens (35 ft., 1913),[7]Westonbirt Arboretum (49 ft., 1927),[22]Royal Victoria Park, Bath (1857, 1905),[23][3] and
Ryston Hall arboretum,
Norfolk (planted as U. antarctica, 1914).[24][25] 'Viminalis' remained in the catalogues of the
Hillier nursery, Winchester, till the 1960s.[26]
Introduced to North America, Ulmus viminalis, 'slender-twigged elm', was marketed by Hovey's nursery of
Boston, Massachusetts, from the 1850s,[27] and by the Mount Hope Nursery (also known as
Ellwanger and
Barry) of
Rochester, New York, from c.1860.[28] In continental Europe, North America and Australasia a few specimens survive in arboreta and avenues. One tree 40 feet (12 m) in height, determined as U. × viminalis Loud. by
Melville, stood by the lake at the
Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne, in 1953.[29] It may have been the Ulmus viminalis specimen present in the Gardens in 1877.[30] In the UK three mature trees survive in the
Brighton and Hove area (2017).[note 1] The tree remains (2017) in cultivation in Australia.[31][32]
Reverted branchlet of variegated 'Viminalis', Batsford Arboretum
Notable trees
Elwes and Henry list notable specimens "of this variety" (the type tree described and illustrated) in the
Cambridge University Botanic Garden (70 ft) and in
Gisselfeld Park, Denmark (60 ft). Three trees labelled U. 'Viminalis', pollarded in 1984,[34] stand in
Benalla Botanic Gardens, Australia.[35][36] A specimen of the same cultivar, apparently unpollarded, stands in Lydiard Street,
Ballarat, Victoria.[31][32]
Two pollarded U. 'Viminalis', Benalla Botanic Gardens, Australia (2006)
Leaves of Benalla U. 'Viminalis'
Cultivars
Cultivars include both sports of the type tree and elms similar enough to have been conjectured as related to it:
Benalla Botanic Gardens, Australia. Three specimens; listed on the Significant Tree Register of the
National Trust.[54]
Pseudo-'Viminalis' and 'Viminalis'-like elms
Not all clones named 'Viminalis' match the named cultivars above. Three specimens supplied by the
Späth nursery to the
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh in 1902[55] as Ulmus campestris viminalis[56] were determined by Melville in 1958 as U. viminalis Lodd but "not the usual nothomorph".[57][58] One stood in the Garden itself till the late 20th century;[58] the other two may survive in
Edinburgh, as it was the practice of the Garden to distribute trees about the city. An old cultivar with leaves that appear to match herbarium specimens of Späth's U. campestris viminalis[59] stands (2018) in the middle of North Walk,
The Meadows, Edinburgh (see gallery); a second, possibly the same clone and age, in the grounds of
Holyrood Palace (both trees lost their crowns in a 2016 gale and are regenerating).[60] The Ulmus campestris viminalis supplied by Späth and planted in 1897 at the
Dominion Arboretum,
Ottawa, Canada, is likely to have been this clone (not to be confused with Späth's
U. × hollandica 'Viminalis').[61]
U. campestris viminalis from Späth, in the
RBGE Accessions Book
Putative U. campestris viminalis (Späth), The Meadows, Edinburgh (1989)
Leaves of putative U. campestris viminalis (Späth), The Meadows, Edinburgh (2017)
^[File:Leaf of U. 'Viminalis' from Elwes & Henry.jpg Leaf-drawing of Elwes & Henry's 'type' tree (1913)]
^[File:Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde, page 215.jpg Schneider, Camillo Karl (1906), Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde, p.215, Fig. "o": f. antarctica
^Hilliers' Manual of Trees & Shrubs. (1977). David & Charles, Newton Abbot, UK.
^
abBean, W. J. (1936) Trees and shrubs hardy in Great Britain, 7th edition, Murray, London, vol. 2, p.621
^Trees and Shrubs Catalogue, Hillier & Sons, 1958–1959, p.99
^Jackson, A. Bruce (1927). Catalogue of the Trees & Shrubs [at Westonbirt] in the Collection of the Late Lieut-Col. Sir George Lindsay Holford. London. p. 195.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
^Dieck, Georg (1887). Haupt-catalog der Obst- und gehölzbaumschulen des ritterguts Zöschen bei Merseburg. Zöschen.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
^
abDieck, Georg (1885). Haupt-catalog der Obst- und gehölzbaumschulen des ritterguts Zöschen bei Merseburg. Zöschen. p. 82.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)