This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This template is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
Space systems
None of the "Space Systems" listed are actually weapons. Why have they been included in this template? --GW… 06:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The Air Force considers them weapons systems in the same manner they consider the AOC and trainer aircraft weapons systems.--
Ndunruh (
talk) 13:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)reply
This template should be renamed USAF equipment. --
108.38.59.50 (
talk) 23:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Indeed, uniforms, which are included, aren't weapons. (
Hohum@) 20:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Template moved. No oppose votes, and it is a legitimate move: template covers more than just weaponry. (
non-admin closure) —
Amakuru (
talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Speedy procedural close: No rationale provided and no supporting comments made after waiting for three days. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 21:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Follow-up comment: It does appear that the template includes various items of non-weaponry equipment, so the suggestion seems worth considering. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 21:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Support move to a more accurate title - especially as there is equipment that is not necessarily a weapons system such as Launch Vehicles, Targets, and Uniforms.
- WPGA2345 - ☛ 23:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Patrol planes & weaponry?
Is there a reason for mthe template missing patrol planes like the Poseidon & Orion, and the weaponry for such, eg torpedoes, depth bombs?
Macktheknifeau (
talk) 13:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Because those are navy and not Air Force
Garuda28 (
talk) 16:31, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply